Jump to content

Fire-Beast-OF FEAR

Members
  • Posts

    639
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Fire-Beast-OF FEAR

  1. I noticed the dirt under them too. Like Malem said I was half paying attention. I didn't want to coaster geek out in front of my girlfriend when i saw a bunch of poles and dirt B)  :lol: .

     

    Possible lighting effects? Something Cedar Fair has been in to recently. Please don't attack me when this is not the case.

    • Like 4
  2. Saw the park was installing a series of poles along The Beast's track in between the second tunnel and the second lift hill. Is this something that has been mentioned on here and elaborated upon already? I've been out of the loop for a while.

     

    Also I'm back.

    • Like 7
  3. I've ridden The Beast recently (last two years) with most trims removed and I don't see much of a difference. the speed lost on the trims are actually mainly lost due to friction on the high speed turns and without the trims they are very uncomfortable and slow.

    Other than that I personally find The Beast sort of an overrated ride in the first place so most of the the hype in my opinion is blinding nostalgia.

  4. To be real, giant flat rides are way out. Parks hate to maintain them and capacity is almost always terrible. The colossal failures of TR:TR, the WindSeekers, and the Dollywood- Huss debacle alongside the near shutdown of major flat ride manufactures Huss and Intamin ring the end of very large flats being made for quite some time. The new trend is a package of 2-3 small flats that maintenance departments and families can enjoy.

    • Like 1
  5. I do enjoy the current look that I-street has to an extent. The shade trees and the grass around the Fountain make for a relaxing area that doesn't look present in the picture above. It serves as a replacement for the old look of Rivertown that D-back and Tomb Raider stripped away.

    • Like 1
  6. I know I've said this before but make sure you read each clubs rules and bylaws before considering joining.

    ACE has one that I particularly hate so ACE was ruled out for me before I even looked at the prices and events offered.

    What rule is that?

    Transmitted from Wild Space via my datapad's DROID brain

    I can see where you are coming from with section C, sub 4. I could see how almost lying to the public can feel like it is out and out wrong, but you have to look at why. Let's say you're a part of club x and you, presenting yourself as a member of the club, state a negative comment discussing a park. That park could see it as that club x has no interest in the park, and could loose PR to that, inhibiting the club in whole. But he does have a point, look at if the club is one that you have the same ideas on the way to act being a part of the club.

    Exactly that one. If people weren't allowed to speak negatively about any parks, Son of Beast could still be here (I liked SOB but I see why others don't and why it was removed). And a certain "Save the Wizzer" campaign would have never happened and we would still have a problematic Arrow multi-looper and a very mediocre B&M flyer at SFGAm.

    • Like 4
  7. ^^ agree with the first sentence. I think an invert is a perfect step from a B&M Hyper and into a wooden coaster or another steel. Three B&M's in a row leaves very little variety for enthusiasts and general guests so I see a giga being a few coasters away from being at KI.

    • Like 3
  8. Some companies (including Cedar Fair as of late) will try in every way to get money out of every possible copyright infringement. TV stations probably don't want to take the risk of that happening so a generic t-shirt that has no logos is a safe bet that wont happen.

×
×
  • Create New...