rcwizard13

I already asked... Did you get an answer?

To the uploader of these three new pictures: Where did you find them at? I would love to see more of the layout and surrounding area in this detail.

Also, know that the Diamondback website was produced by an outside source. I can't recall who built them. But I'll try to find it if people want me to. Anyway..back to decoding for Banshee. Fixed it.

Okay, I understand how you would say this, especially since you're a soldier. Thanks for your service BTW. All I will say is I disagree with you strongly on what you just posted, but would rather just finally close this. Even though it is apparently fair for people to disrespect others, lets just move on. 2 days, 4 hours, 16 minutes. All will be revealed.

Correct, you don't attack individuals. What you do is attack B&M. We get it, you prefer Intamin. But you don't see those that prefer B&M attacking Intamin, do you? Just simply stop attacking other companies and I won't be mad at you.

And for the record, I have no problem if you prefer Intamin over B&M. I only want you to be fair to both sides and not make ridiculous statements like, "There has never been a fatality on an Intamin coaster."

Yes, very classy. I don't remember any fatalities on any Intamin coasters do you? Their coasters aren't made by people like the Dinn Corporation who lots of wood riders used to think had a flawless safety record until that awful Texas Giant incident. You've got to be kidding me, right? Please name me one fatality on an Intamin coaster please? #crickets You asked for it. This list includes six deaths. Among other incidents. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intamin#Safety_incidents Yeah wikipedia is a great source since it can be edited. How about you get some real articles but i'm guessing that post won't come will it? Again, you asked for it. The links on this site link to news reports. Also, Wikipedia is reliable because there are always people changing false statements to fact and to make edits source articles are required and you can click these links to see the source. http://www.rideaccidents.com/intamin.html

Yes, very classy. I don't remember any fatalities on any Intamin coasters do you? Their coasters aren't made by people like the Dinn Corporation who lots of wood riders used to think had a flawless safety record until that awful Texas Giant incident. You've got to be kidding me, right? Please name me one fatality on an Intamin coaster please? #crickets You asked for it. This list includes six deaths. Among other incidents. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intamin#Safety_incidents

1- Maverick 2- Raptor 3- Millenium Force 4- Top Thrill Dragster 5- Blue Streak 6- Gemini 7- Corkscrew 8- Mean Streak I have not been able to ride: Gatekeeper, Wicked Twister, Magnum, Mantis, Cedar Creek Mine Ride, Iron Dragon, Jr. Gemini, and Woodstock Express.

^ And yet another new troll. Sigh.

Kat, I know you're new to the site, but KIC recently had a MAJOR issue which involved the subject of people trespassing where they don't belong. It caused some trouble for the site, and no one here wants that to happen again. I know I'm not the forum police or anything, but I just want to issue a friendly reminder to people - everyone - that they should NOT be trespassing in order to get photos. She didn't trespass. She said she took them from her car on the public drive.

Don't worry, I had your back. I watched plenty of fireworks for you at the Reds game. Three homers. 8-3 win. Go Redlegs! Also, how are some people seriously still questioning the name? Not only is it trademarked, but all the theming clues match up to it. I really don't think the park would fake this one. And, please, no one mention Mustang. Banshee has a significant amount of more evidence than Mustang did. Who are you talking to? Not you. I was referring to my post about not bringing up Mustang, but someone brought it up. It was directed at them.

I'm curious why you think that, given all signs point to Banshee and CF got trademark licensing for it. Unless Banshee will be a new ride in the future at another park? Though that still doesn't explain all the theming that points towards the name BansheeTrademarks are cheap Every enthusiasts in 08 thought the coaster was going to be called Mustang. All the clues pointed to that also. I think it will be a scary theme but not called Banshee. Ahem. Don't worry, I had your back. I watched plenty of fireworks for you at the Reds game. Three homers. 8-3 win. Go Redlegs! Also, how are some people seriously still questioning the name? Not only is it trademarked, but all the theming clues match up to it. I really don't think the park would fake this one. And, please, no one mention Mustang. Banshee has a significant amount of more evidence than Mustang did. Did you skip right over my post?

Don't worry, I had your back. I watched plenty of fireworks for you at the Reds game. Three homers. 8-3 win. Go Redlegs! Also, how are some people seriously still questioning the name? Not only is it trademarked, but all the theming clues match up to it. I really don't think the park would fake this one. And, please, no one mention Mustang. Banshee has a significant amount of more evidence than Mustang did.

I simply cannot pick a side in this debate. They both are great, and both have their cons. Intamin comes first and creates an amazing design, but then B&M come along and "tweaks" it to make it even better. As a result, Intamin gets the credit first, but lots of downtime. B&M gets there second, just without the downtime. Unfortunately, preventing downtime as B&M does creates, in some cases, a bit of a less thrilling ride. If Intamin were to prevent downtime and be first, their rides would be the same as B&M's. Lastly, if you decide one is better than the other, so be it. But if you like one better than the other and decide to bash the other, I find you to be a pathetic fool. *There hasn't been any bashing in this thread, but in others.

If only he would've added invert in there, he'd have been very accurate.

I would take Maverick and put it in the woods surrounded by trees.

Holy crap! You're not lying! http://www.yahoo.com/ Yes (it is possible. Or that it does not. On the other hand it is also possible it will be named Kinzelmonium). Maybe it will be named "Oh SHHHHH****TTTTTTTTTT" - because that's probably what people will be screaming on the first drop. (Pardon the language.) Might as well call it the "Loopty Loop" for Rob Alvey or Weeeeeeee......Weeeeeee.....Weeeeeee I do not think we should give that man the honor of having a coaster named after him. rcwizard13, a sincere Alvey disliker.

thrillseaker92 on the TPR forums has posted some great overlays of the blueprints onto a satellite map. Once again, all credit to thrillseaker92 of TPR. http://www.themeparkreview.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=45427&start=6550

Not really. An inverted wingrider would be the same experience as a non-inverted one. Not above the track. Not below it. But to the side.

For the inversions, I can't see no more than 6 or 7 from those blueprints. Where are some of you getting 8 and 9 from?

As much as I hate to admit it, I'm starting to fear these plans are real. I was really hoping Cedar Fair wouldn't have a leak this time. They were so close and I refused to admit there was a leak. But, ultimately, these plans are just way too impressive to be fake and even match-up with all the footers seen so far. But, on the bright side, it does look very fun and possibly no MCBR?

And where is your source for this? Isn't it usually independent sites that will stream it? And if not that, people will likely be live blogging it. Also, all the renderings, info, and any videos released will be online within minutes. Lastly, I'm sure people will record the announcement and later post it on YouTube. So, if it's hard for you to get to the park, there's no reason to worry. Kings Island tweeted there were no plans to broadcast it live. Ah, thanks for the confirmation. However, my point still remains for all who may have a hard time getting there. You will very likely be able to find out all the details just minutes after everyone there.People asked if there'd be a live feed. I answered. My bad for forgetting a link to the tweet; I forgot everything has to be cited, no matter how small... Yes, any and all info will be on here within 60 seconds of Mr. Helbig speaking. But that isn't a "live stream" Um, ok. I wasn't trying to criticize you in anyway. I was just making sure other people knew. The post is directed at others, not at you. There have been a lot of new posters lately that I'm sure appreciate that kind of information. Sorry if it was hard to understand.

And where is your source for this? Isn't it usually independent sites that will stream it? And if not that, people will likely be live blogging it. Also, all the renderings, info, and any videos released will be online within minutes. Lastly, I'm sure people will record the announcement and later post it on YouTube. So, if it's hard for you to get to the park, there's no reason to worry. Kings Island tweeted there were no plans to broadcast it live. Ah, thanks for the confirmation. However, my point still remains for all who may have a hard time getting there. You will very likely be able to find out all the details just minutes after everyone there.

And where is your source for this? Isn't it usually independent sites that will stream it? And if not that, people will likely be live blogging it. Also, all the renderings, info, and any videos released will be online within minutes. Lastly, I'm sure people will record the announcement and later post it on YouTube. So, if it's hard for you to get to the park, there's no reason to worry.