Cormaster Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Cedar Point is landlocked. In fact they've been land locked for quite some time. I mean the whole park is on a Peninsula! I remember going in 1995 when they held the "world record" for most roller coasters at 11. I remember thinking "This is great, but there's NO WAY they can add anything else". Now its 2010, and Cedar Point has added 5 more coasters since then, including 2 that were the "world's tallest and fastest" at their debut, not to mention all the flat rides they've added. Obviously they've retired some stuff, like Demon Drop and White Water landing, but for the most part they just find room... how do they do it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Cedar Point has 17 coasters today: http://www.rcdb.com/4529.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cormaster Posted July 25, 2010 Author Share Posted July 25, 2010 Then maybe they had 12 at 1995, I dunno... that's not really my question though. Come on man, don't post just to "correct the facts". I'm no historian here ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastForever Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 I think people might always just assume that Cedar Point is landlocked just because it's on a peninsula. In reality, they probably still have some room to expand. And yes, they do mostly tear down rides to build better ones. And they also have some way of FINDING room. Just look at this photo... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 In the near term, finding the money to expand with will be a far bigger concern than finding the space. Terp, just sayin' Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastForever Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Were not talkin' about the money were talking about the space. But yes, that is true, and you were "just sayin" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 It truly does not matter if you have all the space in the world but your lenders will not let you build new coasters...not saying that is where the company is, but the lenders have a huge voice in what is and is not done right now...and will continue to until they do not...for whatever reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cormaster Posted July 25, 2010 Author Share Posted July 25, 2010 Well I do want to know for instance, where did they find room to cram Top Thrill Dragster in at? Its almost in the middle of the park, in an area that seemed full before! What moved, and what renovations did they have to do to accommodate such a coaster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastForever Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 According to Coaster Gallery it says, "A few flat rides had to be moved to make room for Dragster. Also, the Paddlewheel Excursion boat ride had to be altered slightly." http://www.coastergallery.com/CP/108.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Browns Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 I'm always surprised and impressed with how CP finds a way to squeeze in new rides. For Millennium Force they had to relocate the Giant Wheel, Top Thrill Dragster they had to move the Trokia and Chaos, and they removed Mill Race and White Water Landing for Raptor and Maverick. I don't mind too much when they remove old rides, I only wish they would make a greater effort to build around the existing trees instead of removing them. So how do they do it and more importantly how will they continue to do it? Creativity, imagination, removal the removal of old rides, and development of what little untouched land they have left. I predict we'll see a coaster that occupies Iron Dragon's former land and the parking lot next to Disaster in the next few years. Also I could see them removing the turnpike cars and building around Raptor and the theater. I don't think we'll see any press release from CP stating that they've run out of room and that there will be no new rides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cormaster Posted July 25, 2010 Author Share Posted July 25, 2010 Yeah its very impressive. I remember when I went in 1995 I bought a souvenir map, but unfortunatley I've moved probably 5 times since then and I'm pretty sure it got thrown out since at the time I was only 15 and I hung it on the wall like a poster with scotch tape. I wish I still had it, I'd like to look at it and compare it to the park map I have now and see how much its changed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Picard Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 I'm always surprised at how much walking I have to do to get to each ride. If they was low on space you would think they would be closer together. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pillsberry123 Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Remember that Millennium Force was built simply by altering the basic design of a roller coaster and moving the Giant Wheel. After that we were given the most popular attraction in the park. Keep in mind that quite a few companies do all they can to conserve as much space as possible. GCI is known for its compact twisters that occupy almost no space. There are also a few rides in the park that are reaching the end of their lives, but I have a feeling that I would be better off if I didn't say which rides those are. EDIT: 200th post! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Browns Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Just found this site today that has a bunch of old theme park maps. CP has done quite a bit of ride shuffling over the years. I just checked out a couple of maps and already learned something new. I had no idea Wild Cat used to be in the front of the park. EDIT: Better? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KI FANATIC 37 Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Oh my, thast all one link. Pleas do not do that. I don't mean to be mean but that looks really bad. But good website! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dbfan Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 I could see them removing Mean Strak for a ride Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastForever Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Let's talk about what kind of coaster CP would build if they were going to build another one. They already have an invert, stand up, hyper, giga, strata, LSM, bobsled, impulse shuttle, suspended, mine train, out and back woodie, twister woodie, hybrid racing, arrow corckscrew, and steel wild mouse. I could see CP demolishing Mean Streak and putting GCI, GG or an Intamin woodie right there. Besides Blue Streak, CP needs a really good woodie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Mean Streak is many things. A twister is not one of them. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pillsberry123 Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 Let's talk about what kind of coaster CP would build if they were going to build another one. They already have an invert, stand up, hyper, giga, strata, LSM, bobsled, impulse shuttle, suspended, mine train, out and back woodie, twister woodie, hybrid racing, arrow corckscrew, and steel wild mouse. I could see CP demolishing Mean Streak and putting GCI, GG or an Intamin woodie right there. Besides Blue Streak, CP needs a really good woodie. I don't think that removing a ride is necessary for a GCI woodie. They are known for their confined space which is why Cedar Point could use one. I agree they should complete their line-up of rides with a good, modern woodie. Of course we shouldn't talk about their line-up until the mid-August announcement... Oh no what have I done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBEW_Sparky Posted July 25, 2010 Share Posted July 25, 2010 I know this is painfully wishful thinking/likely never to happen/beating a dead horse, but I think Big Dipper would fit wonderfully in the lot beside Disaster Transport and along the beach... that would be so nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Millennium Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Cedar Point doesn't have a good woodie? HELLO? Blue Streak? CP doesn't have a flyer, a floorless, a twister woodie, a dive machine, etc etc etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Browns Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I'd love to see a big flyer on par with Tatsu right in the front of the park. Nothing would be better then walking in to the park surrounded by two world class B&M's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browntggrr Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Cedar Point is landlocked. Technically CP is landlocked. They still have room in the park to add many rides, and still have the parking lot to expand into. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pillsberry123 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Cedar Point doesn't have a good woodie? HELLO? Blue Streak? CP doesn't have a twister woodie Keep in mind that quite a few companies do all they can to conserve as much space as possible. GCI is known for its compact twisters that occupy almost no space. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CincyMan98 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I don't know if somebody said this, but they can get rid of the parking lot, then expand from there, out of the peninsula, then rebuild the parking lot...is that too much? I felt like making this I was bored. Notice there's also the beach, get rid of that area and add a small coaster/ride. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pillsberry123 Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 EDIT: This is kinda copying Cincyman98, so I'm sorry if that seems cheap The top picture shows what spots they can put new rides, obviously the bigger ones would fit coasters the smaller ones would fit flat rides. This is if they DON'T REMOVE ANYTHING or RELOCATE ANYTHING. I also didn't include anything close to the Frontier Trail since I would like to see it stay intact, although there are plenty of locations there that would fit several flats. The bottom picture shows how much of the property is park and how much is resort. Not really related, but I'm surprised how much of the peninsula is resorts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dbfan Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 I could also see the removal of Challenge Park for a ride, and maybe even one of the hotels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Millennium Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Um...do you know how much it would cost CP to tear down a hotel? Not only that, it won't happen for a long time. Not to mention CP expanding to the parking lot is a long shot. They will keep getting rid of rides with low ridership, rides that are hard to maintain, and sometimes rides that are tearing themselves apart. Right now if CP would remove a coaster, most of us guess that it would be Disaster Transport or Mean Streak. I doubt CP will ever have over 20 roller coasters... Cedar Point doesn't have a good woodie? HELLO? Blue Streak? CP doesn't have a twister woodie Keep in mind that quite a few companies do all they can to conserve as much space as possible. GCI is known for its compact twisters that occupy almost no space. Um...ok? How is that in response to my post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastForever Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 EDIT: This is kinda copying Cincyman98, so I'm sorry if that seems cheap The top picture shows what spots they can put new rides, obviously the bigger ones would fit coasters the smaller ones would fit flat rides. This is if they DON'T REMOVE ANYTHING or RELOCATE ANYTHING. I also didn't include anything close to the Frontier Trail since I would like to see it stay intact, although there are plenty of locations there that would fit several flats. The bottom picture shows how much of the property is park and how much is resort. Not really related, but I'm surprised how much of the peninsula is resorts. They could maybe remove Mean Streak and the Lighthouse Point Resort for a whole a new section of the park. And your right, they do have a lot of the peninsula as just resorts. I'm not really a Cedar Point expert so I might be wrong but maybe the Light House Point isn't that popular and not many people go to it. But we all know that Mean Streak isn't very popular and that could be removed for expansion or a coaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Browns Posted July 26, 2010 Share Posted July 26, 2010 Cedar Point is not going to remove any hotels, if anything they will probably add more. Cedar Point doesn't want people from out of town to spend their money at Sandusky Hotels and restaurants they want that money at the park. Think about what makes more money for CP local teenagers that come for the day and maybe a drink and a hot dog or an entire family from out of town that spends multiple days inside the park, eating breakfast, lunch and dinner at CP and sleeping in a CP hotel. Thats why they renovated Breakers 10 years ago, just recently renovated Sandcastle, added Castaway Bay, and added Breakers Express a few years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.