chickenbowl

Where did you get that info? https://www.visitkingsisland.com/Banshee/the-evidence/wail-of-the-Banshee-blog/blog-article/Title Sweet thanks

Where did you get that info?

We've known that for a while now

That second image is from the (what I think is fake) Bat page from earlier this week.

I fail to see how that confirms anything. The Bat page was taken down soon after being discovered as well. And you know the picture we just saw wasn't for sure because...? The Kings Island PR department is a tricky bunch. My point still stands. Because this image had to be uncovered by someone with good coding knowledge, this was way deeper than The Bat page. That was clearly meant to be found. KI could never expect someone to find this image...

Why? You got everything you were hoping for. He was clearly being sarcastic, maybe even implying that you should feel grateful, cause Valleyfair hasn't gotten anything this great ever.

True, but longest Invert is more marketable than tallest and fastest closed-circuit Invert. I'm still hoping for it being taller than Alpengeist, but shorter than Wicked Twister.

Have you been here? It will break the record for longest, and not for height. We can't rule out other records yet, who knows, this could still be over 200'.

Why? Did you think it wasn't going to be an Invert? Cause all the proof was there.

It's in the .css of their site, kind of: https://www.visitkingsisland.com/css/screen.css This line was commented out: /*.m2014-microsite #marketing .container .leftborder.internal, .m2014-microsite #marketing .container .leftborder{ background: url('/images/purple/border-panel-left.png') top left no-repeat; } .m2014-microsite #marketing .container .rightborder.internal, .m2014-microsite #marketing .container .rightborder{ background: url('/images/purple/border-panel-right.png') top left no-repeat; }*/ This was the fake one: .m2014-microsite #marketing .container .bottomborder{ background: url('/images/structure/border-panel-bottom-2014.png') top left no-repeat; } I assumed there had to be a border-panel-bottom.png in the /purple/ directory. And sure enough, there was. Find more find more!!

Where did you find this?

What do you guys think of the idea of retheming Flight Deck to Bat next year? I think that would compliment Banshee very well IMO, to have 2 "darker" coasters in the back corner of the park!

^ Yeah I think you're lucky if it even comes to half the length of Steel Dragon 2000 (8133 ft). Pyrenees is the current longest Invert at 4048 ft.

^^ I know 100% it's going to be Inverted. haha

How do you 100% know the drawings are accurate?It should also be noted companies like B&M are always coming up with new concepts which we have never seen yet. Because they have an Engineering stamp on them. And because they were found in the City Office. Of course they are, and maybe that was a bad point by me, but I lowers they likeliness a whole lot when we've never seen any proof of that concept existing... the plans are real, there are to many copies to be a fake. - in my head it goes like this.... WLWT pulled the plans from the city of mason, the day after the announcement date was set. They called KI for a statement, which was declined. The decision was made to release the plans before the news. done and done. another set of plans that showed up today or yesterday, looks to show the "glide path" of the trains. While i am firmly rooted on hoping for a wing coaster, i have to admit the looking at these new plans puts a damper on that there are several areas that just dosent look like it would allow a wide wing thru. Definitely an invert, probably not a wing. trying to stay positive. from a reliability standpoint, i almost hope for something tested and true like a good Invert. New technologies, unproven, irl, break a lot. e.g. The Bat, or that cloudgroper thing Yeah I understand. The glider path you see is the rider + train envelope (or the maximum space around the track that they legally must have to be considered safe), and that is what one looks like for an Inverted train. I'm not sure if you've ever been on a Wing Coaster. But in general, I find Inverts a ton more forceful, and a lot more comfortable. While I do like the look of them, they don't deliver as good of a ride. Take my opinion as you will. I'm not trying to argue or flame, just point out my reasons for thinking what I do. The forces would be un-noticeably different. The ride design would be slightly altered and would most likely feel identical to a normal Wing Coaster. The whole concept has no marketable value, is impractical, and will not happen. Why is this even being discussed? It's called decoding. And it would appear not everyone is confident in your findings. You do realize that new things happen right? The argument of " I know I'm right" ain't cutting it. There's nothing to "decode" anymore. It's an Invert, deal with it. I honestly don't care if you don't believe me. But I'm just trying to show people what is actually happening here. I read plans for my job, and I know what is happening in those drawings. This WILL 100% be an Invert. I was just trying to spread the knowledge and discontinue wrong ideas in this thread. Sorry bout it... i never said it wasnt an Invert. Go back and read. Since the plans are out, its no contest. I can read plans too. the footers seem, to me anyway, a bit wide for a std invert, especially in the loops. Okay calm down.