Jump to content

Quassy Proposal (2 rides) Sparks Concern From Residents


Recommended Posts

Uh, the article indicates the proposal for a new coaster has been dropped, and only two rides are now proposed. There is a substantial possibility that a noise ordinance will be passed, and the park faces neighborhood problems.

By the way, the park is 100 years old. Wonder which of the residents bought their homes before the park was built? Could they not see the park's presence when they bought? And what if they paid less because they live near the park?

Does not the park have a right to continue to exist?

And the article points out that the park would probably NOT be grandfathered under any noise ordinance. Can anyone say taking of property rights without compensation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...