The Interpreter Posted January 5, 2009 Posted January 5, 2009 Also none free to Busch Entertainment employees any more: http://www.bizjournals.com/washington/stor...05/daily16.html http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/...15?OpenDocument Quote
luff Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 Aw that's too bad. It was one of the nice perks to the Bush parks. Quote
CoastersRZ Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 Plain and simple this was a cost cutting move. Its a shame that they felt the need to curtail that perk, but with the current state of the economy, it is understandable. Remember that InBev had originally wanted to get rid of all non-core assets such as Busch Entertainment. They likely could not find a buyer in the current economy willing to pay what they thought that division was worth. Quote
The Interpreter Posted January 6, 2009 Author Posted January 6, 2009 Cost cutting alone or is it step one to delinking the parks from the beer company? Quote
CoastersRZ Posted January 6, 2009 Posted January 6, 2009 That could be a step toward trying to separate the Busch brand from the parks, in an attempt to prove to prospective buyers that the parks are not reliant on the Busch brand to be successful. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.