The Interpreter Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 There's a TON of them in this article: http://tinyurl.com/druwh To begin with, an investment group wouldn't be closing Paramount's Great America to get out the land value. Not since the land is leased from the City of Santa Clara! There's quite a few errors in this piece. Who wants to be next to spot one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browntggrr Posted February 11, 2006 Share Posted February 11, 2006 There's a TON of them in this article: http://tinyurl.com/druwh To begin with, an investment group wouldn't be closing Paramount's Great America to get out the land value. Not since the land is leased from the City of Santa Clara! There's quite a few errors in this piece. Who wants to be next to spot one? I think you may be interpreting the article too literal. Just because the land is leased, does not make it impossible for a company to buy the park and either lease the land themselves from the city, or buy it from the city outright, sell the rides for a decent profit, and develop the land as they see fit. When it comes down to developers, nothing is out of the question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.