The Interpreter Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 http://www.dividend.com/blog/?p=543 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Butcher Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 They need to get rid of the Dividend and take the stock price hit. Grab the money they wont be paying out in a dividend, to help pay down debt, and then later reinstitute the dividend, or maybe cut it down a little. Companies that are 1.24 B in debt usually dont pay a dividend of 10%. They need to try something though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 Actually, at the end of last year, they were $1.74 billion in debt...$1.24 billion is what they paid for Paramount Parks. They actually borrowed MORE money at the time to be able to keep paying the distributions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jzarley Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 CF is in a rough spot...I definitely agree that a company with their balance sheet shouldn't be distributing a 10% dividend, but that may be the only thing that's keeping the stock as high as it is. They've made a lot of promises to unit holders based on that distribution... I wonder if Kinzel ever wakes up in the middle of the night and thinks "what have I done???" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted June 28, 2008 Author Share Posted June 28, 2008 And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake54321 Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them... That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Butcher Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them... That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like? I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Picard Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them... That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like? I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321! I would guess that it wouldn't be as much as the loss from the fall in stock price. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jzarley Posted June 28, 2008 Share Posted June 28, 2008 ^ I'd say you're right on that one... Based on the units that Dick Kinzel personally owns (according to the SEC filings), every $1 decrease in stock price decreases his net worth by a little over $1.3M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lake54321 Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them... That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like? I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321! I would guess that it wouldn't be as much as the loss from the fall in stock price. Well I guess, but considering he really never PAID for most of it anyway. Most of it was given to him in his bonus package every year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted June 29, 2008 Author Share Posted June 29, 2008 Well, I am sure Mr. Kinzel would say it wasn't given to him. I am sure he would say he earned it. And I bet the IRS agrees..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigellinus Posted June 29, 2008 Share Posted June 29, 2008 Based on the units that Dick Kinzel personally owns (according to the SEC filings), every $1 decrease in stock price decreases his net worth by a little over $1.3M. That sure is a lot of nickles!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crazypkikid2005 Posted June 30, 2008 Share Posted June 30, 2008 Well, I am sure Mr. Kinzel would say it wasn't given to him. I am sure he would say he earned it. And I bet the IRS agrees..... The only thing Kinzel has ever earned is a slap in the face. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.