Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They need to get rid of the Dividend and take the stock price hit. Grab the money they wont be paying out in a dividend, to help pay down debt, and then later reinstitute the dividend, or maybe cut it down a little. Companies that are 1.24 B in debt usually dont pay a dividend of 10%. They need to try something though.

Posted

Actually, at the end of last year, they were $1.74 billion in debt...$1.24 billion is what they paid for Paramount Parks. They actually borrowed MORE money at the time to be able to keep paying the distributions.

Posted

CF is in a rough spot...I definitely agree that a company with their balance sheet shouldn't be distributing a 10% dividend, but that may be the only thing that's keeping the stock as high as it is. They've made a lot of promises to unit holders based on that distribution...

I wonder if Kinzel ever wakes up in the middle of the night and thinks "what have I done???" ;)

Posted
And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them...

That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like?

Posted
And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them...

That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like?

I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321!

Posted
And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them...

That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like?

I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321!

I would guess that it wouldn't be as much as the loss from the fall in stock price.

Posted

^ I'd say you're right on that one...

Based on the units that Dick Kinzel personally owns (according to the SEC filings), every $1 decrease in stock price decreases his net worth by a little over $1.3M.

Posted
And during every conference call until very recently, Mr. Kinzel stressed how important the distributions were and the fact they keep increasing them...

That wouldn't be because he owns LOTS & LOTS of units, wonder what his dividend check looks like?

I never, ever thought of that. You just made me smile real big Lake54321!

I would guess that it wouldn't be as much as the loss from the fall in stock price.

Well I guess, but considering he really never PAID for most of it anyway. Most of it was given to him in his bonus package every year.

Posted
Based on the units that Dick Kinzel personally owns (according to the SEC filings), every $1 decrease in stock price decreases his net worth by a little over $1.3M.

That sure is a lot of nickles!!! ;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...