The Interpreter Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 Good videos, nice article, but the premise is completely, utterly and totally wrong: ...Now here's the thing. The out-and-back coaster known as the Comet was a more sinister ride in its early life. Back when it was called the Crystal Beach Cyclone.The Cyclone, which operated until the mid-1940's, had a lot more dips and turns and twists. It had a figure-8 layout and several turns that could make you nearly fall out. It was said that the amusement park kept a nurse on site to administer first aid to any patrons who felt faint upon riding the coaster. Eventually the ride became a headache to maintain – the gravitational forces of cars careening around highly banked track at break-neck speeds forced the operators of Crystal Beach to reftrofit the Cyclone into the Comet that we all know and love.... http://blog.timesuni...n-scarier/2214/ There's only one small problem with that....the two are totally different coasters...Charlie Wood often told me that the only part of the Crystal Beach Cyclone used in the Comet was part of the structure was used to rebuild the station. Now that the article is on the Internets, younguns will now tell us old people we don't know what we are talking about. At least he didn't write that Magnum or the Kings Island Vortex is sinking. Even Roller Coaster Database claims Comet was built using much of Cyclone's structure. I knew Charlie Wood, who relocated the Comet to The Great Escape. And Charlie knew and dealt with many of the people who originally built the Comet at Crystal Beach...And Charlie said the only part of Cyclone that lived on in the Comet was in Comet's station. Think about it, Cyclone was a Traver ride...while Comet is a Schmeck wooden coaster. As we will see, at least one source says part of Cyclone's steel was used in Comet's lift hill. In any event, they are two totally different coasters. Sigh. Mr. Chuck Miller wrote the article I cited, he cites an excellent website: http://cec.chebucto....rk/Crystal.html And what does IT stay: ... In 1946 the park's power lines were placed underground and plans were made to replace The "Cyclone" with a new, longer ride capable of running three trains: The "Comet".... not rebuild...replace. To be fair, it also says: ...Seen through this tangle of girders is a Comet train on the lift hill. Much of the steel here, including the lift hill, came from The Cyclone. ... Sigh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shark6495 Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 I believe I asked this question before and I got an answer but I think there is some debate in it. When a ride is being sold/bought/transfered and it is a wooden coaster, what are they paying for? The blue prints, the wood, or the name? Names change on a ride, and wood is replaced, so really what is being sold or bought? The history? Ala the Ravens in Baltimore have all of the history from when they were the Browns, but the new Browns also keep that same history (or at least the fans do.) So if a ride reuses the old material, is it a new ride or the old ride envisioned? When SOB lost its loop was it a new ride? I am not sure if there are any clear cut answers to the above questions but for at least a moment they are fun to think about.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaveStroem Posted June 28, 2010 Share Posted June 28, 2010 All I know is that we will be giving the current Comet a few spins next week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.