The Interpreter Posted November 25, 2010 Share Posted November 25, 2010 Details here: http://www.latimes.c...0,3267615.story Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkroz Posted November 25, 2010 Share Posted November 25, 2010 Honestly, I think it's all for the better. I didn't understand the point of bringing in so many kids brands, like The Wiggles and Thomas, when you have an already-successful brand with Looney Tunes. What it created, for me, was an over-crowding - the fact that some parks had all three was sort of overkill. Can you imagine if we had Planet Snoopy, a Looney Toons area, and a Thomas the Tank Engine area? That's a lot. And as far as Evel Kineval and Tony Hawk, those both seem to be branding for the sake of branding; they were in-name-only sort of experiences, where a name change will make very little difference (a la Flight Deck). Six Flags has a very strong business with its core IP's - DC Comics and Looney Tunes - and if they can save money by eliminating some other ones, why wouldn't they? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creed Bratton Posted November 26, 2010 Share Posted November 26, 2010 ^^ I agree! I see it all for the better! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyGuy4KI Posted November 26, 2010 Share Posted November 26, 2010 Very interesting! Hope the complaints don't come like people do with CF detheming! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREMiERdrum Posted November 26, 2010 Share Posted November 26, 2010 Some of the replacement names seem to be very CF-ish. "Flying Fruit Cups?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.