February 9, 201115 yr Good for FUN. Nice to see a semi positive article about them instead of the Q garbage.
February 9, 201115 yr Author Just remember, if it were not for Q, chances are there would be NO article about what FUN is worth right now, as unit holders would likely have been handed $11.50 per unit, and the Kinzels would have stayed on with millions and millions more...then, quietly been shown the door. Also, there are those who think the company would have then be merged with Six Flags, which Mr. Kinzel thinks is Q's plan as well... It was Q and Mr. Raynor who organized the opposition to the Apollo "merger," campaigned against the transaction, and even bought shares at far above the proposed buyout price.
February 9, 201115 yr Author Closed today at $19.03, up 59 cents or 3.2 percent on nearly double the average daily volume...or up more than 65 percent over the price that Mr. Kinzel would have had unit holders be forced to sell their units for (but NOT his...).
February 11, 201115 yr Author Closed today at a 52 week high, $19.28, up 36 cents or 1.9 percent, on high volume, 237,681 shares...but down 18 cents in after hours trading.... http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:FUN&client=news
February 16, 201115 yr Author http://www.sanduskyregister.com/sandusky/news/2011/feb/16/cedar-fair-stock-keeps-rising
February 16, 201115 yr Author Separately Hilliard Lyons has downgraded FUN to neutral: http://www.favstocks.com/cedar-fair-l-p-fun-downgraded-by-hilliard-lyons-to-neutral/1633288/ FUN closed today at $19.82, up two cents, or 0.1%.
February 16, 201115 yr Separately Hilliard Lyons has downgraded FUN to neutral: http://www.favstocks...eutral/1633288/ FUN closed today at $19.82, up two cents, or 0.1%. I put no stock in a site that can not even properly list what properties they own.
February 16, 201115 yr I assume the error is the website's, not the brokerage firm's.... That makes sense.
February 16, 201115 yr The site does not state why they changed it to neutral. Do you think they feel it has topped off?
February 16, 201115 yr Author Normally to find the reasons why a brokerage firm has changed their rating of a stock, one must be a customer or pay for their advice... I don't trust most brokerage firm recommendations, nor their "research." They have their own motives (including churn).
Create an account or sign in to comment