The Interpreter Posted October 21, 2006 Posted October 21, 2006 by Hilliard Lyons: http://www.newratings.com/analyst_news/article_1394603.html Quote
jzarley Posted October 21, 2006 Posted October 21, 2006 Not suprising considering the recent results (and guidance) and the new debt load. However, I would expect most investors would have considered FUN a "long term" holding to begin with...you gotta hold it for a while and enjoy those dividends (Even if they did have to borrow money to pay for those dividends over the next few years... ) Quote
ragerunner Posted October 21, 2006 Posted October 21, 2006 I still say, with the recession coming in 2007 and probably 2008, Cedar Fair picked a very bad time to take this much debt on. We may still find that they have to unload a couple of parks to keep their stock under control in the next few years. Quote
The Interpreter Posted October 21, 2006 Author Posted October 21, 2006 Actually, I think they need to be far more concerned about the creditors and terms in loan agreements than they do the unitholders. Quote
jzarley Posted October 21, 2006 Posted October 21, 2006 I definitely agree with you on that one. The lenders have certainly been SF's headache lately... However, the last thing CF needs is a revolt by the unit holders...by and large, they've been a pretty happy, quiet group. (Except for some opinions on the most most recent offering.) Imagine the first year they're not able to pay a dividend--I wouldn't want to be Kinzel on that call! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.