Jump to content

Paramount To Open New Tomb Raider Ride


Recommended Posts

Nope. CBS wanted out of the theme park business. Viacom, which owns Paramount Pictures, wanted no part of the domestic theme park business...which is how CBS ended up with the parks to start with...then CBS sold them for $1.24 billion, which doubtless upset the daylights out of the Viacom people, who had not wanted to keep the US/Canadian parks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...and here i was thinking CBS landed the parks because they were deemed a "slow growth" operation.

and...

if Viacom wanted no part of the domestic theme park business as you claim, why then would Viacom not approve of the CBS sale of parks they no longer desired a part of Viacom portfolio

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viacom also played with the idea of selling the parks in late 2004/early 2005 before the split to Viacom/CBS and at the time Kinzel and co. had stated numerous times that they weren't interested in such an acquisition (at the time). In fact, hardly any interest was show at all. Funny how things change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so you mean to tell me that Viacom, with all their resources and advisors, did not know how much the parks were worth and could potentially go for? I find that beyond hard to believe, especially in corporate america, and even more so with the media juggernaut Viacom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one, not even CBS, thought Cedar Fair would be zany enough to pay $1.24 billion for the parks. The very tippy top estimate of what the parks would bring was $1.25 billion, and that was basically a sucker's figure, designed to get bidders excited and bidding. Cedar Fair, to be kind, paid top dollar at the top of the market, right before the real estate bust, what with the credit crunch.

Note that the market cap for the entire company now hovers right around what Cedar Fair paid for just the Paramount Parks....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They paid top dollar to be kind? (lol) "No one" is a fairly broad sweeping term, CBS knew, maybe not a large number of individuals but to think otherwise would be naive. To this day I don't believe there has ever been any information released regarding bidders/bids for the Paramount Parks. I've never read anything about CBS being shocked the parks went for that selling price. Im not trying to be rude, but again, I just cannot believe CBS didn't have a very accurate selling price for a company that is in an extremely slow growth market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They paid top dollar to be kind? (lol) "No one" is a fairly broad sweeping term, CBS knew, maybe not a large number of individuals but to think otherwise would be naive. To this day I don't believe there has ever been any information released regarding bidders/bids for the Paramount Parks. I've never read anything about CBS being shocked the parks went for that selling price. Im not trying to be rude, but again, I just cannot believe CBS didn't have a very accurate selling price for a company that is in an extremely slow growth market.

Believe it.

Everything that everyone has chimed in on is perty much accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time of the auction, most analysts and industry experts (i.e., Dennis Spiegel), estimated that the Paramount Parks would go for somewhere between $800M to $1.25B, with most assuming the parks would go for right around $1B. However, from reports at the time, there were multiple serious bidders so the price continued to rise. Obviously, CF was one of the final bidders (since they "won" and all), but the other final bidders have never been disclosed. Although, if I were betting, my money would be on one of the equity funds like Blackstone, etc.

Something I've always found kind of interesting...after the acquisition was announced, CBS/CF had to release Paramount Park's financial performance information as part of the SEC conditions of the merger (something we had never seen before, since the parks were always just an operating unit of a larger corporation). Those reports showed Par Parks to be financially very solid and successful...HOWEVER--CBS had no corporate debt attributed to the parks, so in effect they were operating in a debt-free environment (pretty much a true EBITDA situation). Obviously, CF doesn't have that same luxury as to roll up the parks' debt to a different balance sheet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...