Jump to content

kings dominion new coaster in development


Recommended Posts

I think the thing looks killer!

I think a Nascar, or racing in general, theme is going to fit it perfectly.

The high banked, high speed turns are be great!

The only thing that makes me scratch my head is the name. I know it is based on the height.

But this thing is named/endorsed by DEI, Childress, and Chevy. Any Chevy guy would agree that the 305 V8 is the absolute WORST V8 engine Chevy made! LOL. They should have made it 304, or 306, just to keep that number away from it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 712
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

After I saw it announced, I plan on going back to BG to get some more Apollo's Chariot goodness. It is my new favorite ride. Blows DB out of the water, sorry.

Apollo's Chariot? Better than Diamondback? I'm really sorry but NO. AC is a good ride and all, but you don't really get much airtime on the camelbacks. You get more airtime going down the first drop and going down the drop after the MCBR. On DB, every hill before the MCBR is PACKED with floater air. Plus I prefer the open seating to the old 4- across.

Heck, it's not even my favorite in that park. Or second.

1. Griffon

2. Alpengiest

3. Apollo's Chariot

4. LNM/ BBW

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sitting here dying with laughter at all the people on this board who bash coaster after coaster and then have the nerve to call themselves enthusiasts. If you find something wrong with every coaster in existence and even get to the point where you refuse to ride certain things just because it's an Intamin, Vekoma, etc.. guess what? You are NOT an enthusiast.. you are a spoiled brat. Read my sig.. true enthusiasts don't sit around with their nose in the air, bashing coasters.. true enthusiasts RIDE.

/rant

I made whats in bold my quote on facebook. Very very very true!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I plan on going back to BG to get some more Apollo's Chariot goodness. It is my new favorite ride. Blows DB out of the water, sorry.

Your kidding. AC is just a mediocre B&M. The first hill is a joke with the false first drop. There are a few decent elements to it but DB is a much stronger ride with much stronger G-forces both positive & negative ones. Now Nitro at SFGAdv on the other hand is right up there with DB. This is the best of the older generation B&M sit downs IMO.

We will be on Goliath tomorrow to be able to compare it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't a "fake hill" on AC. B&M's signatures are pre-drops. It's not supposed to be a scary "fake" hill... It's to reduce strain on the chain lift. :blink: And also, it's an amazing ride. Really. It has some incredible elements Diamondback just doesn't. It's turnaround is an incredible rising helix, it does some awesome dives on its side... Very amazing, and airtime out the wazoo. Overall, I prefer Diamondback, yes, but AC is HARDLY mediocre. And I've been on plenty of B&Ms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned yet, but at the announcement there was a sign saying the height requirement is only 40 inches... Millennium Force's height requirement is 48 inches, I wander why this is 8 inches lower? Cause if it really does use the OTSRs like Maverick, than I'd think it's height requirement would be 52 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://themeparks.about.com/od/parkridesan...eir-Journey.htm

Look at this photo, and it should explain everything clearly. Its a single "c" shaped bar that raises and lowers over one's head, and rests on or close to one's lap, with no portions of the device crossing or covering one's shoulders, hence the name over the shoulder lap bar. Now, cruise on over to the Intimidator305 webpage and take note of the devices on the train rendering... or take a look at any photos of Maverick's trains and the difference will be self-explanatory.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That isn't a "fake hill" on AC. B&M's signatures are pre-drops. It's not supposed to be a scary "fake" hill... It's to reduce strain on the chain lift. :blink: And also, it's an amazing ride. Really. It has some incredible elements Diamondback just doesn't. It's turnaround is an incredible rising helix, it does some awesome dives on its side... Very amazing, and airtime out the wazoo. Overall, I prefer Diamondback, yes, but AC is HARDLY mediocre. And I've been on plenty of B&Ms.

I say the best parts on AC are the dive turns. By far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://themeparks.about.com/od/parkridesan...eir-Journey.htm

Look at this photo, and it should explain everything clearly. Its a single "c" shaped bar that raises and lowers over one's head, and rests on or close to one's lap, with no portions of the device crossing or covering one's shoulders, hence the name over the shoulder lap bar. Now, cruise on over to the Intimidator305 webpage and take note of the devices on the train rendering... or take a look at any photos of Maverick's trains and the difference will be self-explanatory.

Oh, I get it! So it really is just a lap bar but comes over your head. Okay. I thought it actually mean its over your shoulders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sitting here dying with laughter at all the people on this board who bash coaster after coaster and then have the nerve to call themselves enthusiasts. If you find something wrong with every coaster in existence and even get to the point where you refuse to ride certain things just because it's an Intamin, Vekoma, etc.. guess what? You are NOT an enthusiast.. you are a spoiled brat. Read my sig.. true enthusiasts don't sit around with their nose in the air, bashing coasters.. true enthusiasts RIDE.

/rant

I made whats in bold my quote on facebook. Very very very true!

Thank you! I'm glad at least one person understands what I mean, instead of twisting my words around and then blowing a gasket at me.

I'm amused at the large amount of people who can't just enjoy coasters.. they have to be negative, nitpicky, and make everything an argument.. the only person's day they're ruining is their own, so IMO they need to take an extra strength chill pill and just enjoy life. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course that was before KD took a step back and changed their website to now say that it is OTSR not just OTS lapbars.

Actually, it says OTS lapbars with shoulder straps, which I think sounds like it would be more like a seat belt (or racing harness) on your shoulders rather than something solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned yet, but at the announcement there was a sign saying the height requirement is only 40 inches... Millennium Force's height requirement is 48 inches, I wander why this is 8 inches lower? Cause if it really does use the OTSRs like Maverick, than I'd think it's height requirement would be 52 inches.

No. The sign at the announcement says 48" is the minimum requirement:

intimidator305010.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course that was before KD took a step back and changed their website to now say that it is OTSR not just OTS lapbars.

Actually, it says OTS lapbars with shoulder straps, which I think sounds like it would be more like a seat belt (or racing harness) on your shoulders rather than something solid.

I'm pretty sure it will be exactly the same as Maverick.

p19564.jpg

misc_Train.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if it's been mentioned yet, but at the announcement there was a sign saying the height requirement is only 40 inches... Millennium Force's height requirement is 48 inches, I wander why this is 8 inches lower? Cause if it really does use the OTSRs like Maverick, than I'd think it's height requirement would be 52 inches.

No. The sign at the announcement says 48" is the minimum requirement:

Yeah it does say 48 Inches. I didn't see the little line in the middle making the zero turn into an eight. Woops... :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See Pilgrim's Plunge. THOSE are overhead lap bars, and the information on the Intimidator website was likely changed to avoid any confusion, as its restraint system appears to be a Maverick clone which is quite different.

Look at it this way,with the OTSR's it allows for smaller riders to safely enjoy the ride....the height requirement is only gonna be 48 inches so that's a plus for both my nephews who are getting passes in 2010 so they can ride.I'm still a little disappointed with the layout though but after looking at the model at the front of the park I think it may prove to be a decent ride.

Yesterday at the park was crazy what with the huge storm that rolled in around 2 pm & shut everything down til around 5:30 & I never thought it was gonna stop raining but fortunately it did because darn if I'm gonna go to KD & only get on one ride before calling it a day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...