Three Charlotte teens working at as food vendors at Carowinds face charges after police say they were involved in a scheme to steal from the food stand.

Two 17-year-olds and a 16-year-old girl were charged with breach of trust and criminal conspiracy after an investigation, according to a York County Sheriff's Office report.

The trio is accused of conspiring to steal $260 from Cinnabon inside the Fort Mill-area amusement park, the report said. The money has been recovered.

Last week, a 20-year-old Carowinds employee was arrested after security personnel recovered $813 in stolen money from her underwear....

http://www.heraldonline.com/2010/07/14/2310280/3-carowinds-employees-charged.html

Sigh...

I liked this comment posted under the article:

$260? That's about the price of three kiddie meals and a large Coke...

^^^ LMAO

^I hope you know people think you are talking to the comment three posts above yours, maybe a "^" would work better instead.

Please do not correct me. Besides that is the way I do it.

Wow... To both the discussion happening here and the article posted. As far as the article, it's awful that this happens, but it does. Something I found humorous is that it said "Two 17-year-olds and a 16-year-old girl." The sixteen year old's gender is specified, but the gender of the two 17-year-olds, listed first, is not. Are we to assume that, because this is a story about stealing, we should automatically assume it's males? If it were three girls, it would say so. But it was two 17-year-olds and a 16-year-old girl. The fact that a girl is stealing is note-worthy, while it's so expected that the other two are males, they need not even specify.

P.S. "Please do not correct me"? "That is the way I do it"? It's really sort of telling that you're communicating in a way that is making your message unclear, but would rather continue to do so and be "right" rather than to have to change in favor of a clear discussion. Would you rather be "right," or make sense? I suppose we found out...

The 20 year old last week with money found in her underwear, allegedly stolen, was also identified as a she.

Terpy, just notin'

Happy. And I never noticed the part about the gender of the older two. Wonder why they would do that?

This is just pathetic...

The 20 year old last week with money found in her underwear, allegedly stolen, was also identified as a she.

Terpy, just notin'

The underwear was allegedly stolen, or the money?

So far, only the money...but as in one thing, perhaps overall...

Or Underoo...

He'll be here all week, folks!

(I was waiting for someone to deliver the straight line!)