The Interpreter Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 http://m.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/OSHA-fines-Bristol-amusement-park-for-18-6786988.php Headline is misleading. A proposed fine is not a fine.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stashua123 Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 Just the media wanting to have more clicks I suppose. The story that this site printed makes the story itself a little bit confusing, I wish they could make it better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted January 31, 2016 Author Share Posted January 31, 2016 OSHA proposed actions can be confusing. See also Camden Park. Or, back when Son of Beast was being built, Kings Island.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldiesmann Posted January 31, 2016 Share Posted January 31, 2016 See http://www.shrm.org/hrdisciplines/safetysecurity/articles/pages/contest-reduce-osha-fines.aspx for a good explanation of the park's options. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted January 31, 2016 Author Share Posted January 31, 2016 ...now whether or not those are options for Camden Park... There is a big difference between Jane and Jack Boylen and Palace Entertainment...though some claim the latter is currently being shopped... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.