Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

There have been a lot of topics floating around talking about whats gonna happen in 2008 thought id make a new topic since 2008 is just now around the corner. So if you have any ideas or rumors for whats gonna happen to the park this coming summer lets hear them.

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

If the rumors are true about the G trains going on Racer, and no more Backwards Racer, I will be one P*ssed puppy. Don't kill something as enjoyable as the Backwards Racer.

Posted
If the rumors are true about the G trains going on Racer, and no more Backwards Racer, I will be one P*ssed puppy. Don't kill something as enjoyable as the Backwards Racer.

The last time I rode the backwards Racer it was rough, painful, and quite unenjoyable to tell the truth...

Posted
Don't forget new TR theming and no more Backwards Racer.

WHAT!!! how do you know about the backward racer is not going to be backwards no more?

Because of the possible "new" trains right?

Posted
I think the Nick Parade is coming back to the park for 2008. (All summer)

Awesome, I loved the Nick Parade so when I was a kid, I always watched it after I rode The Beastie. Memories.....

Don't forget new TR theming and no more Backwards Racer.

WHAT!!! how do you know about the backward racer is not going to be backwards no more?

Because of the possible "new" trains right?

I would Guess so. You have to do SOMETHING with the GL Trains!

But, If they Put G-Trains on The Racer, and Villain on The Beast, I will be P*SSD, God I love the PTC ones.

Posted

I thought the rumor about the trains being used on either Beast or Racers had already been shot down? I thought I read somewhere that they are simply being stored at KI and not going to be used on any coaster at KI.

Besides that, I would think if Interpreter says it ain't happening, then it ain't crappenin'.

Posted

And logistically it's a staffing issue.

On non busy days, you would only have to staff one side of Racer and keep the other side closed.

Remember, this would be done at each park that operates a front/back coaster.

Interp... I'm counting my coasters as they've hatched.

Posted

Personally, I wouldn't mind if The Racer went back to all-forward operation. About the park having one-sided operation on slower days... hell, it's not like The Racer staff raced the trains most of the time anyway! Even in '07, it looked like the old Paramount people were running the place... and not just because they kept wearing the Paramount Parks blue shirts.

Posted
Personally, I wouldn't mind if The Racer went back to all-forward operation. About the park having one-sided operation on slower days... hell, it's not like The Racer staff raced the trains most of the time anyway! Even in '07, it looked like the old Paramount people were running the place... and not just because they kept wearing the Paramount Parks blue shirts.

There is a point there.

I think that it's very cool if they do race the coasters.

But it seems over the last few years that no one has really carred about that.

Maybe they forget that the name is Racer.

Posted

Its proably not a worker issue its probaly a mangment issue. Getting both the trains to dispatch at the same time is going to require waiting for one side or the other which would cut down on capcity. And how many people crew The Racer 3 on each side if I am correct so that means the park is probaly only shelling out an extra $240 dollars to a day at $8 an hour for 3 people for 10 hours a day. Of course you would have less maintance cost but I mean how much can that really save.

Posted
Its proably not a worker issue its probaly a mangment issue. Getting both the trains to dispatch at the same time is going to require waiting for one side or the other which would cut down on capcity. And how many people crew The Racer 3 on each side if I am correct so that means the park is probaly only shelling out an extra $240 dollars to a day at $8 an hour for 3 people for 10 hours a day. Of course you would have less maintance cost but I mean how much can that really save.

And to think that the park felt it was valuable to do it for decades. <G>

Posted
Its proably not a worker issue its probaly a mangment issue. Getting both the trains to dispatch at the same time is going to require waiting for one side or the other which would cut down on capcity. And how many people crew The Racer 3 on each side if I am correct so that means the park is probaly only shelling out an extra $240 dollars to a day at $8 an hour for 3 people for 10 hours a day. Of course you would have less maintance cost but I mean how much can that really save.

Keep in mind that an hourly wage is only a portion of what's spent on actual labor. There's cost of uniforms, benefits, etc, some companies the wage paid to the employee is half of what the company actually spends on the employee.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...