The Interpreter Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 http://www.daytondailynews.com/hp/content/...8kirideweb.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIfan73 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm kind of stunned right now...finally...real details....3 loops!? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Theater Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 http://www.daytondailynews.com/hp/content/...8kirideweb.html OMG,Still no name given.Im dissapointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 8, 2008 Author Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm kind of stunned right now...finally...real details....3 loops!? Remember who wrote the article....think of them looking at a drawing on paper. Is a helix a loop? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIfan73 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 ^Great point. Definitely a possiblity. Longer than The Vortex doesn't sound bad, for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DropZone99 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm kind of stunned right now...finally...real details....3 loops!? Remember who wrote the article....think of them looking at a drawing on paper. Is a helix a loop? On Mindbender at SFOG they classify it having three loops because of it's 'helix'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catzdrummer09 Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Well, I kind of hope that it doesn't have inversions because I've never been on a true hyper...except for Magnum. But they say it will look similar to griffon to the GP so immelmans maybe? But then again, it is no longer classified as a hyper if it has inversions so never mind...they must mean helices in the article. Plus if you think about it, the true name for a loop is a "vertical" loop...so these may very well be helices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WooferBearATL Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Well, we were just talking about permits today. Good on the Oxford press for breaking this. Actually some good investigative journalism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Well, we were just talking about permits today. Good on the Oxford press for breaking this. Actually some good investigative journalism. Makes you think if they came on here and took browns idea! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm sure if this ride would take riders upside down, it would sound more formal stating that it would have "inversions", not loops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WooferBearATL Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 Wonder if this will push up the parks announcement. I'd guess that the park did not think that the info would be published so early. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm sure if this ride would take riders upside down, it would sound more formal stating that it would have "inversions", not loops. its the Oxford press not U.S.A today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 8, 2008 Author Share Posted July 8, 2008 ..quoting the blueprints.... Your turn... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 ..quoting the blueprints.... Your turn... as they said 3 loop's and a water feature, makes you think of a dive machine....but then again they did say 8 cars holding a total 32 ppl. but then again they coulda made a mistake since you can have a diver with 4 rows of 8. I really wanna say its a diver but the article says other wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Browns Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 OMG,Still no name given.Im dissapointed. I think there is still a good change the marketing dept. (whoever names it) has not narrowed it down to one yet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongliveKingsCobra Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I had a spasum attack when I read this. Then was a little let down, ohhhh well I can wait for a name....I hope this is gonna be one KICK ASS COASTER! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
markr Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't think there's any rule that a hyper coaster cannot have inversions. I am inclined to think perhaps there are loops on the coaster since there are 8 rows 4 across. I am just basing this upon Nitro at Six Flags Great Adventure which has no inversions and has 9 rows of 4 across. I am just guessing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WooferBearATL Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 OMG,Still no name given.Im dissapointed. I think there is still a good change the marketing dept. (whoever names it) has not narrowed it down to one yet. Yup, names do not need to be submitted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I'm sure this coaster is named, and everything is done. I think with this it'll probablly push up the date they announce it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I don't think there's any rule that a hyper coaster cannot have inversions. I am inclined to think perhaps there are loops on the coaster since there are 8 rows 4 across. I am just basing this upon Nitro at Six Flags Great Adventure which has no inversions and has 9 rows of 4 across. I am just guessing. It just depends on how you think about it. you could have 4 rows , 8 across 8 rows , 4 across 32 rows , 2 across Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Theater Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I hope thay get it up as soon as possible,I want it to open Opening day 2009!(We all know thats not gonna happen!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 8, 2008 Author Share Posted July 8, 2008 I hope thay get it up as soon as possible,I want it to open Opening day 2009!(We all know thats not gonna happen!) We do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cody Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I hope thay get it up as soon as possible,I want it to open Opening day 2009!(We all know thats not gonna happen!) We do? Maybe It will open up on opening day 2010? who knows! o wait we do! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avatar Posted July 8, 2008 Share Posted July 8, 2008 I know a lot of Disney World plans for new structures and attractions are found out through the local planning office by interested fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flightoffear1996 Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 4,200 feet is short for a hyper coaster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 4,200 feet is short for a hyper coaster. I know, this is what makes me think if this article is real... with that huge clearing they have it's kind of hard to believe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browntggrr Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 This is really very sad news.... It means the rumor coaster for 2009 thread will not hit 6000 posts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonathan Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 This is really very sad news.... It means the rumor coaster for 2009 thread will not hit 6000 posts. LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Interpreter Posted July 9, 2008 Author Share Posted July 9, 2008 This is really very sad news.... It means the rumor coaster for 2009 thread will not hit 6000 posts. And you know this how? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iChase Posted July 9, 2008 Share Posted July 9, 2008 This is really very sad news.... It means the rumor coaster for 2009 thread will not hit 6000 posts. Oh, it will, it will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.