Jump to content

FLASH: INBEV TO BUY A-B FOR $70 A SHARE


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They aren't having financial problems...this is a case of an international company buying with what is for them cheap dollars. It is probably the first of many such acquisitions. I can see the same thing happening to either Six Flags or Cedar Fair or both...and even possibly to Disney some day...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get how A-b could be having financial problems.... you know how many people drink bud light? I figured my friends alone would be enough to keep A-B an american company

Not as many tomorrow as there was today.

It's sad to see something that was considered part of America die out.

Sad situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CNN was doing a story yesterday about the $70/ share offer and the potential for AB to be owned by a foriegn company.

I was surprised on the bitter taste it was leaving in people's mouths.

I, for one, hope that this deal does not go through (even though the likelihood is about 99% that it will). For my own ulterior motives; I love the Busch parks and would hate to see them owned/ operated by someone else. AB has done such a great job with the parks, it is unthinkable that someone else can do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if they want out bad enough they will sale the parks individually and about three will be sold. The rest will go like Geauga Lake.

Would go the way of Geauga?

Which of the Busch properties could you possibly compare to what Geauga was?

I'm with Browntggr on this one.

Yes it's sad about Geauga, but honestly that's like comparing Strickers Grove to Disney World.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

....It is one of 10 parks nationwide owned and operated by the subsidiary Busch Entertainment Corp., which employs about 26,000 full-time and seasonal workers and reported 2007 sales of $1.27 billion, about 8 percent of Anheuser-Busch's net sales. The other parks include SeaWorld and Busch Gardens.

Anheuser-Busch and Sesame Place officials would not speculate on the ultimate ownership of the amusement parks, whether InBev would keep them, or sell all or part to another operator. Last week, before the deal was struck, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch quoted an InBev spokeswoman, Marianne Amssoms, as saying it was "too early in this process" for InBev to have decided.

The newspaper paraphrased Amssoms as saying InBev understood the theme parks' contributions to the areas where they operate and would try to help preserve that role.

Equity analysts have said the company would focus on the beverage business and probably would face pressure to sell the parks. But at the same time, the economic slowdown and tight credit markets might make it difficult for InBev to find a buyer able to afford the parks.

The other large public companies that specialize in theme parks are Six Flags Inc. of New York and Cedar Fair Entertainment Co. of Sandusky, Ohio....

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/business/20...es_to_sale.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It wouldn't really surprise me if InBev does hold onto the parks for a while. (Unless someone like Parques Reundios or some big venture captial firm steps up right away with a pile of cash...) From all reports, the parks are profitable and do a good job in their PR efforts for the company, so why not keep them around? Especially in such a down market...a fire sale now doesn't particularly make a lot of sense. While it maintains close ties to the parent company, BEC is its own operating entity and wouldn't necessarily have to distract InBev from the core business.

The rumors were pretty strong right after the GE purchase of Vivendi-Universal that they would immediately unload the parks, but yet a few years later they still own and operate them. (And, have even added--or are in the process of adding--some pretty extensive new attractions.) It was the same deal...the market didn't look so great for the sale of the parks at the time, so they held on to them. And, while a sale of the Universal Parks probably still isn't out of the question, from their actions it seems like they may have realized the value of the parks to the overall business...

Who knows...I think I'm most pleased about InBev keeping the Clydesdales--that would have been awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...