Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just pull out the old Beastie signs and stick them back up. You couldn't ask for a more perfect name for a kiddie coaster anyway. Which is exactly why I still call it that!

Posted

No, not red. Then, you'll have some on here complaining that KI has too many red coasters...oh wait, they already are.

Posted
No, not red. Then, you'll have some on here complaining that KI has too many red coasters...oh wait, they already are.

One is too many?

(Taking into consideration that the new one isn't open yet.)

Posted

Even though it hasn't opened yet, I am already hearing grumblings about it being red. Now, you open the new ride which is red, repaint the FOC red, you have Firehawk which is a shade of red, then there would be three total. Not that I really care, as long as the coaster is kick butt.

Posted

As stated in the other thread, I talked to some very credible Kings Island officials and they asked me to assure you that there are no plans to change the name of the Fairly Odd Coaster or any ride in Nickelodeon Universe.

Posted
Not that I really care, as long as the coaster is kick butt.

How can it be with the stockpile of...oh why do I even have to say it again? You know what I'm going to post. And yes, Beastie has one of those too. I have a strong preference for riding it when it's off. Last October was a lucky month, and I rode it several times.

Posted
And even then, the poor beastie has been reprofiled....missing a bunny hill, and a tunnel, too, for that matter....whilst the similar ride at Kings Dominion has had no such changes...

I think you mean a fairy hill.

On a serious note, the changes sadden me. It's a classic and shouldn't be changed. The tunnel is no biggie but the hill?

Posted
They never should have renamed that ride. Even though all the others got Nickolodeon names that one should have stayed the same.

And if they hadn't renamed it, it'd be Scooby Doo. And still have to be renamed...unless they had bought some licensing rights again.

Posted

IMO The Beastie was the very best name it could have. It was unique and tied that particular coaster to the park with a very special (and very cool) name. It should have remained The Beastie forever, and would have required no licensing to do so, hence the reason that it should be returned!

Posted
IMO The Beastie was the very best name it could have. It was unique and tied that particular coaster to the park with a very special (and very cool) name. It should have remained The Beastie forever, and would have required no licensing to do so, hence the reason that it should be returned!

since it has always been pastelish...whats with the orange paint blotches showing through here and there?

Posted
IMO The Beastie was the very best name it could have. It was unique and tied that particular coaster to the park with a very special (and very cool) name. It should have remained The Beastie forever, and would have required no licensing to do so, hence the reason that it should be returned!

since it has always been pastelish...whats with the orange paint blotches showing through here and there?

The rails used to be orange and the rest that purple color, http://www.rcdb.com/ig72.htm?picture=1 .

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest rcfreak339
Posted
Even though it hasn't opened yet, I am already hearing grumblings about it being red. Now, you open the new ride which is red, repaint the FOC red, you have Firehawk which is a shade of red, then there would be three total. Not that I really care, as long as the coaster is kick butt.
and just 2 years ago we where all grumbling that KI didn't have any red coasters.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...