Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

CF has a good working relationship with GCI. Me personally I like to see both a GCI and RMC at KI.

Would it be conflict of interest for both companies to work together on the same project? I feel like that would be a cool concept if they worked together. Also did anyone see my comment about recycling the name Rougarou for this project? It was a couple pages back.

  • Like 2
Posted

CF has a good working relationship with GCI. Me personally I like to see both a GCI and RMC at KI.

Would it be conflict of interest for both companies to work together on the same project? I feel like that would be a cool concept if they worked together. Also did anyone see my comment about recycling the name Rougarou for this project? It was a couple pages back.
No I didn't mean the same coaster. I meant in by GCI and one by RMC.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

Sounds like construction is ready to start once this coaster is announced. I wonder truly if a coaster will be the only thing announced Thursday, with no one else really teasing another ride (that I can recall) this could possibly be quite a revamp of the area. BUT It could still be fairly small amount of money in the grand scheme of things considering I have heard that there will be a few hotel renovations in the chain and those add up quickly. 

  • Like 5
Posted

Multiple things could be announced, see the 2016 announcement, a new water slide complex, a new entrance, all season long drink bottles, etc. 


We'll see on Thursday what will be new for 2017.

  • Like 7
Posted

I don't know how tall this will be and how long it will be but when did construction start on the structure on SOB? When did they start building the lift hill and other parts to begin?

Posted

^ I wonder what the lumber pieces are from? Also was that wood in a white tarp like it was shown in the previous pages?[/quote

Yes and I'd say is about 1.5 times more than what is shown in that picture.

  • Like 3
Posted

Cost, Reliability, Past relations with GCI? CF may want to test RMC with a conversion before diving straight in with a new ride.

1fa186a41339946522cf379ec051cd58.gif

Dee Dee Dee!

Beast Gal, how many times will you reuse that?

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

  • Like 6
Posted

Cost, Reliability, Past relations with GCI? CF may want to test RMC with a conversion before diving straight in with a new ride.

1fa186a41339946522cf379ec051cd58.gif
Dee Dee Dee!

Beast Gal, how many times will you reuse that?

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

She'll stop Thursday when our GCI is announced

Sent from my SM-G935P using Tapatalk

  • Like 12
Posted

I'm sticking with RMC because of the lack of structural supports.

The reservoir crossing(and the majority of the back half of the ride) doesn't have supports like a GCI. Its too narrow for traditional wooden coaster supports. Not to mention that if it were to be GCI, KI would miss out on some awesome inversions over the 6 times it crosses WWC. We are talking places where that is only 25-30 feet of space for BOTH tracks to pass over WWC. I cannot see supports similar to The Racers passing over the lake when RMC CAN build within that limited space of 25-30 feet.

This whole claim that GCI said that hypothetically, possibly, and/or potentially they can make coasters with inversions holds no weight in the argument. One hand you have a coaster company that IS building incredible wooden/hybrid coasters with inversions. The other hand has a company that only says, "yeah, we can do that."

Past relationships mean squat. In a world of innovation, no one would want to build something new that would disappoint. I'm not saying one is better than the other and that GCI would disappoint. They are both great companies and have their pros/cons. If this was being built in a space that wasn't this I would be all for a GCI.

Given the location of this ride and its multiple interactions with WWC, it would be a disappointment to waste all those awesome opportunities to hang over top of the WWC canals. Can you imagine riding WWC with a coaster flying upside down overhead? Everyone in the cars reaching down to, figuratively, high-five the families and friends inside the WWC boats. Not to mention how it will enhance the train experience. Riding alongside this coaster is sure to entice guests.

I'm also going to throw in the highly possible "top gun stall" over the reservoir.

Launch or chain lift is cool with me.

*RMC clues given out by KI*

Something I noticed on Instagram:3e72a53a7d54457d0e6211efae8a2e4b.jpg

Somebody is following Cedar Fair parks...a66262607ec41e69ce0c7d89e7a88c0f.jpg

And now a Rocky reference...a52bf7b16b7b01fe05e306cb31f77fc9.jpg

Also the tease of barrel rolls. A signature move by RMC.

This, my friends, is why I'm team RMC!

  • Like 12
Posted

I raise you this, White Lightning a GCI made with steel supports to reduce the need for lateral supports.......also notice the shape of the turn around.

 

 funspotgci.jpg

(Image from Coasterbuzz.com) 

 

I also agree, thank you for actually giving reason to why you are leaning a certain way about a manufacturer. I have seen way to many people who reply to every tweet with the hashtag with just "RMC2017".

  • Like 12

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...