SonofBaconator Posted August 31, 2025 Posted August 31, 2025 Whenever I ride The Racer and glance to my left, I still picture Firehawk sitting alongside Flight of Fear. Today that area is home to Orion, a giga coaster that undeniably represents progress for the park. Yet Firehawk continues to stand out in my memory, perhaps even more than Vortex, because of the unusual role it played in Kings Island’s coaster lineup. When it opened in 2007, Firehawk was not a brand-new, custom-built attraction like most of Kings Island’s major coasters. It was a relocation from Geauga Lake, where it had operated as X-Flight. Its arrival came at a pivotal moment: Cedar Fair had just acquired Kings Island from Paramount, and Firehawk provided a fresh experience that helped smooth the park’s transition into a new era. In a park known for groundbreaking originals like The Beast, Vortex, Son of Beast, Diamondback, and Orion, Firehawk often felt like the “adopted child.” It wasn’t designed for Kings Island, and its Flying Dutchman model was notorious for capacity issues. Yet it offered something the park lacked at the time - a flying coaster that flipped riders onto their stomachs and sent them soaring headfirst through drops, rolls, and dives. This gave Kings Island a unique draw in the late 2000s and positioned the park competitively within the region. Firehawk also served a practical role. It bought Cedar Fair time to prepare for Diamondback in 2009, which became the company’s first major new build at the park. Even after Diamondback’s debut, Firehawk maintained popularity until its removal in 2018, showing that its appeal endured beyond its initial novelty. The larger question is whether Firehawk deserves to be remembered in the same light as other departed Kings Island coasters such as Vortex, King Cobra, Screamin’ Demon, or Son of Beast. Those rides, for better or worse, were all original to the park and helped define its identity. Firehawk, by contrast, was inherited - but it still managed to leave a lasting impression. So how should Firehawk be viewed in the park’s history? Was it merely a stopgap, a secondhand addition that served its purpose, or did it truly earn a place in Kings Island’s coaster legacy alongside the originals? I’m curious how others rank Firehawk among the park’s lost attractions and whether its impact was greater than its relocated status might suggest. 2 Quote
MaestroJr Posted September 1, 2025 Posted September 1, 2025 To me it was never a huge favorite, I always viewed Firehawk as a unique coaster but definitely one that I didn’t ride very often, the loop always made me feel kinda uncomfortable, I did enjoy the flying aspect of it and riding it the final day it was open was definitely a memorable experience but at the end of the day I think Orion is a far superior coaster than its predecessor and one that appeals to a wider audience Quote
WoodVengeance Posted September 1, 2025 Posted September 1, 2025 I remember during a middle school field trip to Kings Island, my classmates were talking about this coaster the most (this was after Diamondback was put in). I could see why the flying aspect of Firehawk could be appealing for the general public (although not for everyone), and I do think it was good for what it was. There aren't that many flying coasters in the region, with the closest one being Superman at Six Flags Great America. With that being said, however, it was often a coaster I forgot was even at the park, especially in its later years. It was just plopped in the back of X-Base (now Area 72) with very few places in the park you can actually see it. Of course, The Beast is also a coaster that's well-hidden at the park. However, The Beast still manages to be arguably the most iconic coaster in the park despite that because of it's status as the longest wooden coaster in the world as well as having famous night rides. Firehawk didn't really have anything like that going for it, other than just being a flying coaster. Also, Firehawk's capacity wasn't the best for a park like Kings Island either. Unlike Firehawk, Orion has far more of a presence in the park given that it's a giga coaster that can be viewed from many vantage points in the park. In addition to that, Orion's ride experience is more appealing to a larger portion of the general public, since not everyone found the flying/laying position on Firehawk to be that comfortable. The capacity is also a huge improvement over Firehawk. I appreciate Firehawk for what it did for introducing people like myself to flying coasters, but Orion is just a better ride for the park. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.