Orion-XL200 Posted yesterday at 01:40 PM Posted yesterday at 01:40 PM https://www.reuters.com/world/seaworld-sued-over-alleged-mishandling-sesame-street-brand-2026-03-12/ Mishandling the brand and unpaid royalties. 1 Quote
IndyGuy4KI Posted yesterday at 02:24 PM Posted yesterday at 02:24 PM So the courts already sided with sesame street one. Probably not looking good for Seaworld with this new filing. Quote
Orion-XL200 Posted 23 hours ago Author Posted 23 hours ago I'm not positive if this includes the Busch Gardens parks, since technically they are all under the United Parks front and they do have Sesame Street themed rides/attractions. Quote
jzarley Posted 23 hours ago Posted 23 hours ago ^ I’m pretty sure the suit would apply to the entire chain (legal issues typically got rolled up to the corporate level), although there’s probably park-specific violations of the IP licensing they’re citing. That’s a sad situation—United/SEA/BEC has a long and mutually beneficial relationship with Sesame Workshop. IMHO this is just one more example of the negative aspects of how the current PE control of them has damaged the brand. When I was at SEA, the agreements with Sesame Workshop were taken *very* seriously—even to the point of staffing character interactions (i.e., if Elmo and Abby Cadabby appeared together it was specified that Elmo had to be taller than Abby) 2 Quote
Losantiville Mining Co. Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago The biggest question I have is if United Parks loses the case will the Sesame Workshop pull their licensing agreement, thus forcing UPR to rebrand their Sesame attractions? As we've discussed on here, there aren't a ton of family area IPs out there. Six Flags: Looney Tunes, DC, and Peanuts Disney: Marvel, Star Wars, Pixar, Fox (20th Century Studios and such), etc. Also uses Bluey for some experiences Universal: Dr. Seuss, Marvel (in IOA), Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, Nintendo, Illumination (Minions), How to Train Your Dragon, Dreamworks (the various Shrek properties), Spongebob (at the upcoming Universal Kids Resort) etc. Herschend prefers to make custom family areas, though may still have some rights to use Cartoon Network properties. United Parks and Resorts: Sesame Workshop Other potential IPs that could be used: Thomas the Tank Engine The Wiggles Nickelodeon properties (currently in use at Nickelodeon Universe and the American Dream Mall) Hanna-Barbera (I think they might be licensed under Paramount at this point) Cartoon Network (also under Paramount once they buy Warner Bros. Discovery) Peppa Pig (used in the Peppa Pig Theme Park) In a timeline where Sesame Workshop is going to look for a new park chain to partner with, I wouldn't entirely mind seeing Six Flags ditch Looney Tunes and bring in Sesame Street. That would complicate things a little in terms of IP spread, but I think the way they use LT is a little tacky compared to how Peanuts is used. The DC properties are a good thematic bridge into bigger rides for the older kids though. Quote
jzarley Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago My suspicion is that the law suit will force United to pay then things will go on like always. This isn’t the first time they’ve stopped paying bills just to see how far they could push it—I’ve seen that before (granted, at least then the pandemic could be blamed) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.