Browntggrr Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 http://www.theotherpaper.com/substory2.html SoB had a price tag of $21 million? Wow, did Paramount get taken to the cleaners on that decision. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jzarley Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 ^ I also wonder how much they got back from the lawsuit... I saw the paper version of the article this morning...Dave Althoff is quoted. Back years ago from reading his posts on rec.roller-coaster, I learned pretty much everything I know about coasters from him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Browntggrr Posted July 21, 2006 Author Share Posted July 21, 2006 I was not sure about this article, or the name of the paper for that matter, if it is reputable or not; but after reading that Dave Althoff Jr. is quoted in it, I put much more faith in it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIBeast Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dave is a really smart individual. They don't call him the ride man for nothing. I may be in the minority here, but I want Son of Beast to stay. Maybe Cedar Fair will either have the track retro fitted with Intamin plug and play track or maybe new Intamin custom wood coaster trains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKIVortex Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I would like Son of Beast to stay. I also beleive that those heavy trains have alot to do with the roughness of the ride. They said in the article that one of the reasons for taking one car of each train was to help cut down on the wear and tear on the track. Anyone know what kinds of trains would be better for SOB? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastersRZ Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I believe that the park won the lawsuit, but has yet to receive any money from the lawsuit. I`m sure that they hope to receive the money soon, especially if they need to make repairs after the investigation is concluded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vortex Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I would like Son of Beast to stay. I also beleive that those heavy trains have alot to do with the roughness of the ride. They said in the article that one of the reasons for taking one car of each train was to help cut down on the wear and tear on the track. Anyone know what kinds of trains would be better for SOB? Well some steel coaster trains would fit. I would like to see some ML flyers made just for SOB. Who knows all new trains might make this the best ride in the park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Picard Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I think the problems are bigger than just track and trains. It's my guess that the supports and footings are the cause of rough ride. You can retrack it with what ever you like but without something to hold it up it's not going to fix it. This may be why it doesn't get fixed. They would have to start over from the ground and they are not going to do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIBeast Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Not saying that you are wrong, but, you are the first person I have heard mention that the roughness is caused by the structure and not the track or the train. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKIVortex Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I was one of the few people who got to ride SOB the day it opened to the pubic before getting shut down for another few weeks. I don't remember it being so rough that day? Anyone else ride it that day in 2000? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.