How much land does Kings Island have to expand on?

[TheBEASTunchained]

I was curious if anyone knew how much land Kings Island has to expand on? Is there more land that could possibly be purchased to make further expansions in the future?

[KI FANATIC 37]

I want to say Ive heard they have a lot of that land behind Beast and DB.

But dont quote me.

[NyTrO]

^^ yeah I believe that is correct I've heard the same from many members of this forum. I always have said look at a overhead view of the park back by The Beast and all that wooded area is the parks. Not sure how the terrain is but that's all owned by Cedar Fair

[BB1]

Going from The Racers, back to the river is the boundry, the rest I do not know, but the terrian has so many inclines, some of that terrian is "unusable".

[BB1]

http://www.KICentral...section-to-pki/

Refer to this for more information.

Also

http://www.KICentral.com/forums/index.php?/topic/2052-pki-property/

[sam2cpa]

http://www.KICentral.com/forums/index.php?/topic/12296-park-acreage/

Here are the details on the land owned by KI.

[Jordan68]

On 6/27/2012 at 8:04 PM, sam2cpa said:

http://www.KICentral.com/forums/index.php?/topic/12296-park-acreage/

Here are the details on the land owned by KI.        g

Kings Island, in Mason, Ohio, owns around 775 acres of land. This provides ample room for potential expansion and the development of new attractions in the future.

Edited October 24, 2023 by Jordan68

[BeeastFarmer]

On 6/27/2012 at 8:03 AM, KI FANATIC 37 said:

I want to say Ive heard they have a lot of that land behind Beast and DB.

But dont quote me.

@KI FANATIC 37...I'm gonna quote you.

[Tr0y]

Maybe they will get a couple bags of sand and dump them along the banks of the Little Miami River.

That way they can market themselves “The Roller Coast.”

[OverlandTaxis30]

From what I read, they bought all the land they had on the advice from someone involved with the foundation of Disneyland. So that, they wouldn’t be boxed in as well as to provide a big enough buffer against development so as not to be a nuisance. 

[disco2000]

3 hours ago, OverlandTaxis30 said:

From what I read, they bought all the land they had on the advice from someone involved with the foundation of Disneyland. So that, they wouldn’t be boxed in as well as to provide a big enough buffer against development so as not to be a nuisance. 

They had way more than they do now.  A prior owner sold a lot of it off.

A lot of the undeveloped land they still have left are steep ravines and protected stream corridors, so the actual acreage they have that they could develop on is even less.