chickenbowl Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. That is literally like the biggest red flag as to why this is fake...sorry but I think a major amuesment park can afford spell check. Lol, it's not fake
locostitch Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. That is literally like the biggest red flag as to why this is fake...sorry but I think a major amuesment park can afford spell check. Hey do you realize they don't design it and make the blueprints. First of all they are designed at the b&m headquarters in Switzerland(I think that is the country) they don't speak or write English well so it would be an easy mistake for them. 1
YoungStud Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 can somebody please translate that blueprint please.
Rustbucket Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. Intelligent people do. 10
Tr0y Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. That is literally like the biggest red flag as to why this is fake...sorry but I think a major amuesment park can afford spell check. im unsure if that's the case they did have a misspelling on the teaser signs against the fence 1
DiamondBackGirl Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. That is literally like the biggest red flag as to why this is fake...sorry but I think a major amuesment park can afford spell check. Lol, it's not fake So this guy saying that there were builders at the top of the Eiffel Tower discussing what the ride would be and saying he apparently had permission to leak the blueprints is all legit? Okay. Cool. 1
YoungStud Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 again, can somebody translate the blue print?????
YoungStud Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Who cares about the spelling, geez. That is literally like the biggest red flag as to why this is fake...sorry but I think a major amuesment park can afford spell check. Lol, it's not fake So this guy saying that there were builders at the top of the Eiffel Tower discussing what the ride would be and saying he apparently had permission to leak the blueprints is all legit? Okay. Cool. That is his problem, we just looked on the internet to find it.
PinJim Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Reasons why it is fake: how would you get ahold of them, vicinity is misspelled, he changed his story like 20 times Reasons why it is real: if he faked it himself it would of taken weeks,Numbers match on supports, why would he have faked it for like only 100-200 views HE changed his story cause he could not make out the blue prints IMO. That could be true but like I said I highly doubt that Kings Island misspells things on their blueprints. Engineers made the prints, not Kings Island. And trust me, engineers can misspell. I'm speaking from first hand experience... 6
chickenbowl Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Well here's the whole layout. Try and decipher the elements to your hearts content! 2
Oldschool75 Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 ^They look legit to meMy reasoning behind the fact that this guy is a fraud is that first he claimed this was for sure a dive coaster, then he said giga, now I believe hes saying Invert. He has supposedly had these blueprints all along...wouldnt he know for sure what the ride is?? also he said that ki's twitter posted that the ride would be announced on Christmas...sorry hes a fake. I've been reading his comments on his videos since the beginning. He always changes his story.EDIT: spelling His name wouldn't happen to be Lance would it? 6
YoungStud Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Maybe Intamin is using the same b&m part #'s on their coasters
DiamondBackGirl Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Reasons why it is fake: how would you get ahold of them, vicinity is misspelled, he changed his story like 20 times Reasons why it is real: if he faked it himself it would of taken weeks,Numbers match on supports, why would he have faked it for like only 100-200 views HE changed his story cause he could not make out the blue prints IMO.That could be true but like I said I highly doubt that Kings Island misspells things on their blueprints.Engineers made the prints, not Kings Island. And trust me, engineers can misspell. I'm speaking from first hand experience... Okay...it still just seems way fishy to me...but IF it's real hats off to him.
Gravyboat Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 I'm guessing Wing Coaster. Inverts tend to be rather compact, wing coasters have longer elements. oh and the plans look legit to me. This is an engineering plot for Foundation placement, not the actual coaster blueprints
jdawg1998 Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 ^Someone's upset that this won't be an Intamin ride. 10
kirbias1 Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 If these prints are real, i count at least 6 inversions, with the possibility of 7 or 8.
YoungStud Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Can anyone tell the height and if its a straight or curved drop????
FoF96" Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 ^They look legit to me EDIT: Looks like a right hand swooping drop into a diveloop or immelman, followed by a vertical loop around the lift. Then comes a zero-g, some weird element, another vertical loop, a helix and thats it. What happened to those who know do not share, and those who claim to know, do not??? 3
chickenbowl Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Chicken Head is the man! Lol. So due to my knowledge. I'm looking at this order of elements: Right hand drop Dive loop Vertical loop #1 Zero-g roll Some funky Dive loop/Immelman combo (2 inversions) Vertical loop #2 Maybe a corkscrew and another zero-g? That part is hard to tell. So maybe 8 inversions? 1
Captain Nemo Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 GUYS! Now that the cat is out of the bag you MUST USE the spoiler tag if you are posting about the blueprint! A lot of us (including me) don't want to know anything until it is announced!Please Put the spoiler tags around the text that may be deemed too much information so that the rest of us who don't want to read this information can continue reading the topic. This includes photos! To do this select the SpecialBBCode option when replying int he topic, then select spoiler. It will direct you though the rest.Here is an example... SPOILER Please be considerate. Thanks 7
locostitch Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Chicken Head is the man! Lol. So due to my knowledge. I'm looking at this order of elements: Right hand drop Dive loop Vertical loop #1 Zero-g roll Some funky Dive loop/Immelman combo (2 inversions) Vertical loop #2 Maybe a corkscrew and another zero-g? That part is hard to tell. So maybe 8 inversions? That weird dive loop thingy is a new type of batwing instead of entering and exiting on the same side it is nowdifferent
Bottle Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 The plans are definitely legitimate. They are foundation/structural drawings drawn up by Scheafer Inc. (http://schaefer-inc.com/project/cedar-fairs-kings-island-carowinds-cincinnati-ohio/) Judging by the "office copy" post-it note, he either pulled the documents at the local public records office, works at/knows someone who works at Scheafer, or works at/knows someone who works at R.E. Middleton.
kirbias1 Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 if these prints are not fake, here is what i have decoded. it will dive right then into the immelmann, it will proceed into the loop through the lift hill. After that, it will go into the barrel roll then drop into the valley for another immelmann like inversion or two. after that it will hit another loop and the rest is too hard to tell. that is 6 right there. 1
kirbias1 Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Chicken Head is the man! Lol. So due to my knowledge. I'm looking at this order of elements: Right hand drop Dive loop Vertical loop #1 Zero-g roll Some funky Dive loop/Immelman combo (2 inversions) Vertical loop #2 Maybe a corkscrew and another zero-g? That part is hard to tell. So maybe 8 inversions? I agree.
Recommended Posts