Jump to content

Walt Disney World Resort announces "Frozen" ride for EPCOT


Recommended Posts

I'm hopefully optimistic. The Gran Fiesta Tour at the Mexico pavilion shows that a World Showcase attraction featuring Disney characters can be done well. However, if I'm understanding the linked blog post correctly, this will be less of a "Disney characters experience culture of relevant pavilion" and more "pavilion just so happens to be setting of Disney movie; here's a ride that should really go in Fantasyland."

Also, I seriously wonder whether or not the whole Frozen phenomenon still has enough momentum to still be considerably large by the time this attraction opens.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read this earlier. I'm not impressed. I'd be up for a Maelstrom refurb, but not a removal. I think they need to leave the Maestrom alone and quit with all this over-hyped Frozen stuff. Yes I'm a Disney fan, and yes I enjoyed Frozen, but enough is enough already!

I'm guessing that it will still be the water ride only themed to Frozen. I can see the part where you drop down the hill backwards as where Elsa confronts Anna and tells her to leave the ice castle... and woosh, you go down the hill backwards, then the final splashdown is into the village with all the happy little people, dancing to a happy song and living happily ever after....lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, any guesses that this will be a repurposed Maelstrom are speculation. It's Walt Disney World, so it's a good hypothesis. But the official word is that a ride based on Disney's Frozen "replaces Maelstrom." For all we know, the showbuilding could be demolished and replaced with an entirely new ride.

At this point, fans who held steadfast to their dreams of old Epcot are now entirely crushed. The "hardcore" Disney parks fans are already hating this idea and being very vocal about it.

Me? I'm neither excited nor upset. Not yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last few times I've been to WDW, I've spent the day at Disney's Hollywood and towards closing, I've walked the path through to the Boardwalk Resort and on to the EPCOT entrance just to see IllumNations....then it was off to my hotel. Spectacular show and well worth seeing over and over. (and also Fantasmic on a hot night, it is a blessing in disguise.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm obviously against this "retheme" and for various reasons. Here's something I posted on an animation website that explains my reasoning:

"Another thing that bothers me about this "quick retheme" is that Frozen really hasn't had to prove itself. It's been around how long? 10 months? So what. How long did The Little Mermaid and Beauty and The Beast have to wait before they got immortalized in a Disney park? 20-25 years? We just got the Voyage of the Little Mermaid attraction last year in the New Fantasy Land as The Little Mermaid was turning 24 years old. 24 years it took. And why did they add The Little Mermaid attraction? Because that movie has stood the test of time and has cemented itself as a TRUE Disney classic in the hearts and minds of the general public. It deserved to be given it's own attraction. Disney is milking the Frozen Cash Cow to death. Heck, there's no milk left to be given! I enjoyed Frozen when I saw it last year, but God help me, I'm approaching burn out faster than I can handle. The removal and retheme of Maelstrom to Frozen is a quick and greedy cash grab by Disney and it's just one more way they're squeezing that last drop of milk from that Frozen Cash Cow. How about let's let Frozen sit in the hearts and minds of people for a little while, see if it sticks, and let it EARN it's right to be considered a Disney Classic before it's immortalized as a permanent attraction at the Disney Parks. If Disney princesses were real, I'd feel super sorry for Belle, Ariel, and others who had to wait decades before they got their own attraction in the park and to the others who still haven't earned their rights yet. It's just so obvious and just so sad. Very disappointed."

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm obviously against this "retheme" and for various reasons. Here's something I posted on an animation website that explains my reasoning:

"Another thing that bothers me about this "quick retheme" is that Frozen really hasn't had to prove itself. It's been around how long? 10 months? So what. How long did The Little Mermaid and Beauty and The Beast have to wait before they got immortalized in a Disney park? 20-25 years? We just got the Voyage of the Little Mermaid attraction last year in the New Fantasy Land as The Little Mermaid was turning 24 years old. 24 years it took. And why did they add The Little Mermaid attraction? Because that movie has stood the test of time and has cemented itself as a TRUE Disney classic in the hearts and minds of the general public. It deserved to be given it's own attraction. Disney is milking the Frozen Cash Cow to death. Heck, there's no milk left to be given! I enjoyed Frozen when I saw it last year, but God help me, I'm approaching burn out faster than I can handle. The removal and retheme of Maelstrom to Frozen is a quick and greedy cash grab by Disney and it's just one more way they're squeezing that last drop of milk from that Frozen Cash Cow. How about let's let Frozen sit in the hearts and minds of people for a little while, see if it sticks, and let it EARN it's right to be considered a Disney Classic before it's immortalized as a permanent attraction at the Disney Parks. If Disney princesses were real, I'd feel super sorry for Belle, Ariel, and others who had to wait decades before they got their own attraction in the park and to the others who still haven't earned their rights yet. It's just so obvious and just so sad. Very disappointed."

This × a thousand. I cannot agree with this more. It's a cash grab. Nothing more.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds Fantastic ! Cannot Wait ! I'm sure lots of theming will go into this ! Now, If my family and I could meet Esmeralda, Quasimodo in France all would be well...

PS* - I STILL would like to see a ride based off of The Nightmare Before Christmas! I know one was close to being built.

If you want to see The Nightmare Before Christmas ride goto Disneyland during Halloween time.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a question I have, though...

If World Showcase's France pavilion was getting a copy of Disneyland Paris' Ratatouille ride, would people be this upset? It kind of occurs to me that they wouldn't be... Which is weird. Both Frozen and Ratatouille are incredibly received critically. Frozen earned many times what Ratatouille did. Is that the problem? Is it that Frozen is too mainstream? Is the problem that its princesses? Is it that Ratatouille would be a technologically advanced E-ticket ride in a French pavilion whereas this is assumed to be a quick fix to a C-ticket that will result in the entire pavilion going icy?

While some here are saying Frozen is getting a ride too soon, I feel it's too late. That Disney is allegedly preparing Frozen-themed events for NEXT SUMMER seems a little out-of-touch to me. I get that it was an unexpected hit, but we're now approaching a full year post its release... I guess there's a sweet spot where a film gets a well-done attraction to coincide with its release, and another sweet spot 10 years later when you can call it a "classic." But now.... I don't know. It reads as hokey and forced. Especially if it's a simple re-theme of a short C-ticket boat ride.

Alright, characters don't belong in World Showcase. Sure. But remember how when Epcot opened, it didn't have characters and folks revolted? They didn't want to take their kids to a science center... they wanted fantasy and to meet their favorite characters!

Now, most EVERY World Showcase country has a meet-and-greet at LEAST. Aladdin and Jasmine in Morocco; Belle in France; Mulan in China... The Three Caballeros took over an entire ride in the Mexico pavilion. Is it that Frozen is the straw that broke the camel's back? Or is the Ratatouille vs. Frozen argument valid, where maybe there's more at play?

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is kind of the way Disney does it now....pump out a movie...call it a classic, then post-advertise it with a ride to extend the money grab while it's still fresh in the kiddies minds. There are so many movies and character stuff now that it's kind of frightening. Ask a kid about Mickey Mouse and they know that character....Roger Rabbit, maybe they will recognize the character....Bernard and Miss Bianca...probably not.

At the time the Rescuers was a very popular movie, but even Disney (at the time) didn't see it as "endearing".

Now if a character can be slapped on a lunch box or stuffed into a toy animal it gets its own attraction or themed area (no matter how bad the attraction turns out to be.....Stitch's Escape anyone?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have the pleasure of seeing first hand how big Frozen is. Literally every girl in the park is wearing a Frozen princess dress. Not just the little girls. Full grown women are even coming in here with Frozen dresses on and they all ask "WHERE IS THE FROZEN RIDE???!!!" I know it has only been a year since the movie came out, but it is not hard to tell that it will be a classic, It already is.

Why not cash in on it? Not only does it make the park money, it satisfies the consumers because all of them are asking for more Frozen.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...