silver2005

Going off on a tangent here, but in the 2nd concept picture, it shows Mean Streak still around in the background (I see MS's first fan turns, its not Gemini). Mistake or not?

That picture doesn't look like it has the layout quite to scale. It has the station is out on the midway. I'm pretty sure the entire layout is within the railroad tracks.

I think I may like RMC's coasters that are more focused on bigger elements like Goliath or New Texas Giant, but I'm not a fan of how they try to cram so many elements in such short lengths of track much like the layout of Storm Chaser after the 2nd roll. I imagine I wouldn't like Wicked Cyclone, Iron Rattler or Twisted Colossus quite as much, but I'm willing to let the rides speak for themselves if/when I get around to them. I prefer sustained moments of air time over a bunch of little pops and I don't really like being pinned to the lap bar where my thighs take a pounding. Magnum is about as strong as I'll like. Lightning Run kind of has that, but I found it was more consistent through its layout with the forces. Storm Chaser felt like 2 distinct halves which the layout before the roll was much better than after it. GCI's sort of do those pops, but it doesn't feel as jarring like RMC designs things.

Valleyfair getting a Star Flyer might be the best bit of irony this announcement season.

To me, EPCOT is the one Disney park that might do well without a coaster. I don't think it needs one necessarily.

I've just been going through all the CF parks' Facebook pages, and it kind of looks like they're taking the SIX approach. Some of the hinting the parks are doing don't look like they're matching up.

I'm just speculating based on the time line they're using for Mean Streak's closure. I'm not entirely sure what they intend to do with it. With so much of the chain announcing at the same time, I'm thinking they're getting the same thing. Winterfest's return kinda sounds plausible, though, having it at CP and Canada's Wonderland doesn't seem too smart. I also wonder if they're leaning to a SIX approach now for announcements.

I wonder how long a complete re-track of MS to accommodate Millennium Flyers would take.

Maybe we can have a golden footing for the last one much like the golden spike for the transcontinental railroad.

How about placing a camera at the top of Diamondback's lift? That might work.

Whose bright idea was it to put National Roller Coaster day in the middle of schools starting up in August?

Yeah, I have no problem with that decision.

^Google is your friend. https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=ibew+electrical And since you also blamed IBEW for alienating members on what the markers were for- http://www.pipemarker.com/help-apwa.php

^Part of that is having mods that'll do their jobs. Self moderating can only do so much. You gotta draw a line somewhere.

^Go look at about every post you've made and agreed to with GavPenn in the recent decoding thread. If you're really that far gone to the point where you're that naive to what I'm talking about, well, I'm tired wasting my time with you.

I respectively disagree with you in saying you can compare lightning rod to storm chaser. Lightning rod hits the ending brakes faster than storm chaser's top speed. I HAVE to get this off my head. You cannot judge a coaster over top speed. I really liked Maverick (or Cowboy Coaster) more than I did Millennium Force. Sure the coasters that go 500 feet at 9billion miles per hour can be fun. But I have ridden many coasters that I liked more that are better than the coasters that go 100 to 200 feet taller and go 25-65 mph faster Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N920A using Tapatalk I agree. My point is ALL rides are a different ride experience. Also judging a ride that a person has NEVER ridden based on riding one ride from the manufacturer that's is a DIFFERENT ride experience is ridiculous. So, by your own words, will you stop judging all the GCI's that you haven't ridden in your effort to bash them all the time? Also, learn basic psychology.

@BeastGal- I've been on a lot of fast paced rides, rides that pin you to the lap bar, etc, stuff that mimics LR to an extent and I've been on an RMC. That perspective mixed with watching the POV a lot can help one anticipate how a coaster will flow and act. I don't want to go on a long winded post, but if you know how basic psychology works, you can understand that people can discern things about certain activities without having done them. Its not that hard a concept to understand. No coaster is THAT unique where riding it completely over blows any assumptions about them if one views them without riding them. I never said I know exactly what it would be like, but I have a pretty good idea. This entire conversation is about perception, what one experiences, and the opinions, interpretations, and preconceptions based on those stimuli. Everyone views the world differently. I feel foolish for even trying to explain this to you as every explanation anyone tries to tell you goes right over your head. All you have ever done on these forums is to show how much you don't like GCI and like RMC. That notion in itself is okay because everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but to do so to the detriment of other members is not alright. You have no regard for those who think opposite of your views and you just keep hammering at it. We keep explaining this to you, but you ignore us. Drop the subject and move on. Trust us, we get it. In fact, I challenge you to not make a single post about GCI or RMC, nor any post that could be interpreted as such or being so negative to other members' opinions for a month. Show us you can be different, show us what you actually enjoy about the industry with us, and be a productive member of this site. Also, if you're so into facts, how about calling coasters by their real names (cowboy coaster? really?) and knowing that Holiday World in Indiana doesn't have the coaster Expedition Ge-Force. The ball is in your corner Beast Gal.

Where would you even put a camera to get a good view of the construction?

Uh....that Beast photo third from the bottom has a hand gesture not quite appropriate for the forums....

^Additionally, if someone has been on a lot of coasters, particularly ones from a similar designer as the ones your judging, its not that hard to figure out what they will do. I have a pretty good idea what Lightning Rod will be like with my ride on Storm Chaser. Besides Beast Gal, don't you judge all the GCI's out there without you having ridden them all in about 90% of the posts you make?

I've been curious from time to time as to what the park would be like if KECO were in it for the long haul, especially that alleged woodie that was planned where Diamondback currently resides.

How about we get to be entitled to our opinions regardless of whether we've ridden it or not? Who are you to be so entitled? People can still judge a lot about a ride if they haven't ridden it. Also, how about not criticizing others because their anatomy may not weather certain rides like others can. Everybody is different. What may be (un)comfortable to you may not be to someone else. That goes for respecting others liking what may not as well. Quit hammering your dislike of GCI. I bet you can't make it a month without mentioning it.

I didn't hear Thunderbird make any noises.

^No, I get that from reading Carl Sagan. silver2005, not a Trekkie.

Well, if you believe in the notion of there being an infinite number universes, we could be here a while.