IndyGuy4KI Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Wonder why part of the transfer track area to holding area does not have the criss cross supports (X) but the one half does. The reason being that there will be an access road traveling underneath that portion of track. What does an access road have to do with support beams that are welded inside the frame of the structure? My guess is that the engineers only called for supports on the one side, do to needing extra support for the transfer point of the trains from one track to another. No need to pay for more steel and installation if not necessary per the engineers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigellinus Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 ^^I'm sorry, dude, but proof read next time please! Yikes on that (alleged) English/grammar!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyGuy4KI Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 ^^I'm sorry, dude, but proof read next time please! Yikes on that (alleged) English/grammar!! Opps! That is what happend I guess when you are trying to do 3 things at once. I cleaned it up, but I am sure I missed something. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goofywdw Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Transfer track is all the way over on the left now. Looks like that roof is almost done too. I think we can also almost see the path Beast riders will take when walking up to the entrance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollercoast19 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 New pictures up on KIDiamondback.com! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenageninja Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Looks like the artistic rendering is going to be right about the splashdown, I see some big rocks moving that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyGuy4KI Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 First bad grammer now a double post oh my. Im just kidding. LOL! Sorry about that, my internet got really slow for a few minutes while posting and it got added twice. I am going back to bed now!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firehawk fan Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 The roof looks as if it's almost complete!! And the track looks like it has been moved as well. One other thing, will they put a fence around areas like La Rosas , I can't imagine them leaving that open. Maria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IndyGuy4KI Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 The roof looks as if it's almost complete!! And the track looks like it has been moved as well. One other thing, will they put a fence around areas like La Rosas , I can't imagine them leaving that open. Maria We are not going to be able to see the nice shiny trains when they get them parked in their new home with the roof on. It is going to be intersting how they integrate the surrounding buildings and Beast entrance with DB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailRider Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 The spalshdown is going to look great with those big rocks. Rivertown is forever changed with the presence of Diamondback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
74Gibson Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I keep getting excited about the transfer track moving. I know it's petty but it's just cool seeing one of DB's mechanic components being used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firehawk fan Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Wonder why they moved the transfer track back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWildman424 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I couldn't figure out why they were moving it in the first place. The only conclusion I could come up with is they needed to tell the computer where to stop the transfer track at each position. They could use either sensors or timing the motor. Either way, there is a lot of precision needed and what easier way to do it than actually move the track to each position. If anyone has a better idea of why they moved it, please post it. That's the only one I could think of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWildman424 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Sorry, itouch double posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Nemo Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 This ride is going to be eye candy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrill_Biscuit Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 That landscaping rocks! I just had to. I wonder if the water will be treated with that stuff that makes fake ponds look strangely aquamarine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tchu Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Looking back at the artwork/renders for the ride, and comparing that with what they've started around the splashdown, I'm noticing a definite difference. Granted, there's a long way to go before the landscaping will be 'finished', but it appears that they are going with a boatload more rocks than the renderings showed. If you look at the section under the track, where it dives into the splashdown, it's nothing but rocks. Small rocks, large rocks, medium rocks... but all rock. If you look at the art renderings, the entire area around the water finale is grass... with large boulders only around the very edge of the splashdown. I have to say, if this small glimpse that we're seeing now is how the finished product will actually look... I'm definitely pleased with the change. The splashdown area in the rendered artwork was gorgeous... but with all the grass and shrubbery and what not... it looked far too much like a lagoon, or tropical setting. When I think Diamondback rattlers, and the western theme the park has mentioned for the ride, lots of bright green grass and lush plant life is not the first thing the comes to mind. I think dirt. Rocks. Land that's a little more barren and worn by the weather. Lots and lots of rocks, with some patches of dry earth peaking through would look infinitely more appropriate to the suggested theme. I'm loving what I'm seeing so far. Here's hoping they do keep with the occasional boulder peeking out from the middle of the splashdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teenageninja Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I'd like to see a nice mix of rocks and grass over there. Not a luscious lagoon, but more of like a western pond. Looking great though, I must say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOPGUN1993 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 This ride is going to be eye candy! I wonder if they will connect this "creek" with the old one that use to run under the little bridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RailRider Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Interesting thought definately. Just seems like a long way to recirculate water, I wonder it might just spring up around the station house and trickle down to the splash pool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 "Looking back at the artwork/renders for the ride, and comparing that with what they've started around the splashdown, I'm noticing a definite difference." The animation was done by an outside source and was solely based on renderings. The ride's surroundings in the video involved a designer's personal take. The landscape, outside of the stream leading to the splashdown, was probably not even decided at that time. I've not explored it, but the animation looks to have been done by Keith McVeen. I knew Keith back when he ran "Badnitrus." He would develop 3D renderings of existing rides that were simply amazing. They were so good, in fact, that it led to his being hired by several parks to do animation for future attractions in development. Among them... Paramount's Kings Island. At that time, Keith was in college. I believe he eventually graduated with a degree in Engineering, and now has his own business within the Amusement Industry doing more of the same. The last website of his that I ever saw was: http://www.3dvip.com/ He did the animation for Maverick at Cedar Point, so I'd be shocked if the Diamondback animation was not his. Back to the topic at hand... If you pay close attention to the current work being done in the splashdown area, you'll first notice that hard plastic pool liner has been laid prior to the rock-bedding. The reason for this, rather than just "grass", is an obvious one. It's so that the water will find it's way back to the splashdown pool to help keep the water table at the necessary level. "I wonder if they will connect this "creek" with the old one that use to run under the little bridge." It appears so, and would make obvious sense. The "old one" that ran under the bridge was recirculated from the Swan Lake Pond waters that were pumped to the top. The only thing that may not allow a connection of the two, would be an access road/path to the station. I personally think the creek will be coneected. Shaggy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cory Butcher Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Shaggy, You are correct the animation was done by Keith McVeen, see here: http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:O7na2...lient=firefox-a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongLiveTheSmurfRide Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 The splashdown area in the rendered artwork was gorgeous... but with all the grass and shrubbery and what not... it looked far too much like a lagoon, or tropical setting. When I think Diamondback rattlers, and the western theme the park has mentioned for the ride, lots of bright green grass and lush plant life is not the first thing the comes to mind. It could be considered an Oasis in the middle of the desert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigellinus Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Whew!! Good thing I don't care much for themeing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaredap88 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 when will the water actually be added to the splashdown area? (if someone already asked just ignore that i asked) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goofywdw Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I don't think you could let a bunch of creek water float into a splash down for a roller coaster. A bunch of things jump out to me as things that can go wrong there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeastinNight Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 What is this?? Possibly the concrete footer for the Camera? If you think about it this is an excellent place for it!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnrealNightmare Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 Or a light? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coasterguy15 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 I'm very confident in the fact that that is a footer for a light, because I asked a question during the Party concerning the onride photo. Don said that the cameras would most likely be at the bottom of the second hill because that's where he said the riders would be caught by surprise by the force of the drop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaredap88 Posted February 10, 2009 Share Posted February 10, 2009 i cant wait to see this thing lit up at night...i have a feeling it will be pretty freggin' awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts