Jump to content

The safety of summer thrills (News article on ride safety)


Recommended Posts

I would say something like 90 percent of amusement park deaths I've read about were cause by one of two things:

 

1. Guest entering restricted area or not following safety rules.

2. Unknown pre-existing conditions that made it medically unsafe for the guest to ride. This could happen to anyone but it's not the park's fault.

 

This article is super one-sided and feels like a witch hunt. What happened to the three people mentioned in the article is heartbreaking, and it is odd that an official cause was never released. But I think the majority of parks in the U.S. do everything they can to ensure guest safety. Potentially unsafe rides are removed, rides are tested daily, new rides are built with top of the line safety features. The absence of federal regulation really doesn't make much difference, I'd guess. The states seem to be doing their job.

 

And even with federal regulation, accidents could still happen.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say something like 90 percent of amusement park deaths I've read about were cause by one of two things:

 

1. Guest entering restricted area or not following safety rules.

 

See Raptor @ Cedar Point 2015 and Batman: The Ride @ Six Flags Over Georgia 2002 & 2008

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter what the article says, it is pretty well known how and why James Hackemer died at Darien Lake.  He is a double amputee and Ride of Steel has a lap bar.  The sign in front of the ride says it requires 2 legs and he was missing both.  There was no possible way for him to stay in the seat throughout the ride.  The ride operators are supposed to prevent something like this.  He should never have been allowed onto the ride.

 

Even when federal agencies monitored injuries at Amusement parks the numbers were very low.  For the average person it is much more dangerous to drive to the park then to go ride every attraction at the park.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I made it to the Darien Lake death then stopped reading.  I couldn't stomach the excitement of the rest of the article.......

 

Funny how the writer is clamoring that the amusement park industry does not give patrons the full story of injury stats of rides when the writer does the same thing by not giving the full story on how the man perished.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 1 in 24 million chance of getting seriously injured on an amusement park ride. There is a 1 in 750 million chance of getting killed on one. There is a 1 in 112 chance of dying in a car accident while driving to that amusement park. Statistically, you are safer riding roller coasters than you are driving to an amusement park. They are EXTREMELY safe.

As pointed out before, it is interesting how the author failed to talk about how most accidents at amusement parks are the victim's fault. The amusement parks can't prevent your stupidity. The thing about how no amusement park has ever admitted they were at fault is baloney. I'll have to double check, but I think that Disneyland did claim responsibility for the incident on Big Thunder Mountain in 2003.

I can't stand these articles that try to cause a scandal on how "dangerous" amusement parks are.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also don't understand why they're complaining about amusement parks choosing private settlements to end lawsuits. That's common practice in the business world these days. It brings a quick and quiet end to a lawsuit without requiring anyone to admit guilt.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a 1 in 24 million chance of getting seriously injured on an amusement park ride. There is a 1 in 750 million chance of getting killed on one. There is a 1 in 112 chance of

dying in a car accident while driving to that amusement park. Statistically, you are safer riding roller coasters than you are driving to an amusement park. They are EXTREMELY safe.

As pointed out before, it is interesting how the author failed to talk about how most accidents at amusement parks are the victim's fault. The amusement parks can't prevent your stupidity. The thing about how no amusement park has ever admitted they were at fault is baloney. I'll have to double check, but I think that Disneyland did claim responsibility for the incident on Big Thunder Mountain in 2003.

I can't stand these articles that try to cause a scandal on how "dangerous" amusement parks are.

Uh, no.

Just no.

There is NOT a 1 in 112 chance of death in a car accident on the way to a park. Nope.

Not even close.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There is a 1 in 24 million chance of getting seriously injured on an amusement park ride. There is a 1 in 750 million chance of getting killed on one. There is a 1 in 112 chance of

dying in a car accident while driving to that amusement park. Statistically, you are safer riding roller coasters than you are driving to an amusement park. They are EXTREMELY safe.

As pointed out before, it is interesting how the author failed to talk about how most accidents at amusement parks are the victim's fault. The amusement parks can't prevent your stupidity. The thing about how no amusement park has ever admitted they were at fault is baloney. I'll have to double check, but I think that Disneyland did claim responsibility for the incident on Big Thunder Mountain in 2003.

I can't stand these articles that try to cause a scandal on how "dangerous" amusement parks are.

Uh, no.

Just no.

There is NOT a 1 in 112 chance of death in a car accident on the way to a park. Nope.

Not even close.

 

I would hope not as well. I'm sure there are some people here who have amassed more than 112 total trips to KI in the last 2 years!

 

Maybe they are setting the curve  :)

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

There is a 1 in 24 million chance of getting seriously injured on an amusement park ride. There is a 1 in 750 million chance of getting killed on one. There is a 1 in 112 chance of

dying in a car accident while driving to that amusement park. Statistically, you are safer riding roller coasters than you are driving to an amusement park. They are EXTREMELY safe.

As pointed out before, it is interesting how the author failed to talk about how most accidents at amusement parks are the victim's fault. The amusement parks can't prevent your stupidity. The thing about how no amusement park has ever admitted they were at fault is baloney. I'll have to double check, but I think that Disneyland did claim responsibility for the incident on Big Thunder Mountain in 2003.

I can't stand these articles that try to cause a scandal on how "dangerous" amusement parks are.

Uh, no.

Just no.

There is NOT a 1 in 112 chance of death in a car accident on the way to a park. Nope.

Not even close.

 

So what are the odds? :D

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...