Jump to content

Who do you hope buys Paramount's Parks?


italianchef
 Share

Recommended Posts

I hope I buy the Paramount parks, no. I hope Viacom keeps them they haven't had the parks very long, this is there 13th year. I also like the direction there leading the parks into, thoughj they need to lay off of taken out rides for awhile and expand out.

-Jake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I enjoy Cedar Fairs style of their parks. I love a park with lots of roller coasters and a decent childrens area.

I chose Cedar Fair, but it doesn't show my vote for some reason...

I agree. With a top children's area like PKI has, then add world class roller coasters, and add classic and exciting flats, then you'll have one EXCELLENT park. smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While Cedar Fair runs good parks and I think Cedar Point is one of the top amusement parks in the country, I'd have to say I'd like to see an independent firm run it. I miss the days when Kings Island wasn't a chain park. When it was original and unique and didn't rely on brand names (well, besides Hannah Barbara). While I do enjoy many of the changes Paramount has made, I sometimes feel like the emphasis is more on PARAMOUNT than Kings Island, which is logical with a parent company. But to have a company come in that really cares about the theme park business, has a unique vision for where KI would be headed, and brings its own flavor to the park, would be great. I just feel now that we're seeing KI change from the destination it once was to just a part of a franchise. How long before we see International Street changed to Hollywood Blvd, see Coney Mall just taken over by the Action Zone and see (big exaggeration) the Eiffel Tower transformed into the Paramount mountain?

On the other hand, I wonder what would happen if Viacom did sell the parks. Rides like Top Gun, Face Off, and Drop Zone would be pretty easy to rename and retheme. But what would you do with something like Tomb Raider which pretty much IS themed to the movie or the IJST?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It really doesn't matter who would take over the park becouse they couldn't do any worse then paramount becouse they aren't very good at running the park in the first place.

WHAT!!!???

How so?

If Paramount isn't doing so well running it's parks, why is attendance up at all of them? All of them are said to have great rides, cleanliness, awesome customer service, and nice landscaping. As was said above me, PKI is the #1 seasonal park!! I think that says something about Paramount.

You want to see someone who could do worse than Paramount? Sell PKI to Six Flags, and watch them run it into the ground over the course of only two seasons like they did with Geauga Lake.

But, if I had to choose, I would pick either Busch or Cedar Fair. Both are very good in the operations department, and awesome customer service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I think Viacom is running Paramount Parks very well and should keep running them, I don't see that happening as they have their hearts set on relieving themselves of the #1 seasonal theme park chain huh.gif So the most likely buyer is the quasi-independent company that'll keep things the same (shouldn't be too different), but since the question is who I want to buy the park chain, my answer would have to be Universal (which is unlikely since its owner wants to get out of the theme park industry). While I love Cedar Fair and how they run their parks, they also seem unlikely since they just bought Geauga Lake and are waiting to see how they do (and still recovering). Six Flags is not as bad as eveyone says, slowly they are improving, but they still would dump a ton of money into the park the first two years and all would seem great, then year three comes around and they give no money to the park as they are now in debt and eventually sell it off (where have I seen this before? SFWoA!). While Anheuser Bush would spoil the parks with rides like DarCastle and Atlantis, I would miss the movie themes sad.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I think Viacom is running Paramount Parks very well and should keep running them, I don't see that happening as they have their hearts set on relieving themselves of the #1 seasonal theme park chain huh.gif

Lol, sounds like you're doubting your own words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I misread the question and put Six Flags but i hope Cedar Fair because all their parks are enjoyable. Six Flags are just to small and have no set theming. Besides what would we do without HBBL. Besides The Beast wouldn't be the same without the King's Island trademark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to The New York Post "Tom McGrath, who stepped down as head of Viacom Inc.'s Paramount Enterprises last summer, has lined up investment firms Spectrum Equity Partners and GS Capital Partners, Goldman Sachs' private equity arm, to back him in his efforts to acquire the theme parks business, sources familiar with the situation said."

If Mr. McGrath and his associates manage to purchase Paramounts Parks, I am very cusious about:

1. Will the new company still be called Paramounts Parks or something else? If the new company maintains the same name, one would assume that the Paramount and Nickelodeon licensing agreements are part of the sale. Hence, nothing would really change.

2. If the name of the company will NOT be Paramounts Parks, how different will the new company be? Will it still have Paramount theming (TR:TR, TG, etc.) and Nickelodeon?

We'll have to wait and see. Considering the $1 billion price tag, I think that Viacom would have an easier time selling the parks individually rather than as a package. Though a bargain, we are not in a strong economy and $1 billion is a steep investment for a mature market. That's my opinion.

Have a great off season!

Italian Chef

chef.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, the only Paramount Park I could see Six Flags snatching right up would be PGA, due to it's proximity to SFMW. Six Flags owning the other Great America would eliminate the competition in San Fran.

But then again, PKI is pretty close to SFKK, and PKD is in the same market as SFA, so I guess I don't have a clue. tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine that Viacom would rather sell Paramount Parks as a whole. I could see them being spun off into their own company led by the former Viacom Executive. While they would no longer be owned by Viacom, I think that Viacom would want to keep their advertising in the parks to promote their properties. It is definantly something to watch as the outcome of this situation could have drastic changes for PKI and the other Paramount Parks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...