Leaderboard

It's a little hard to see anything from the webcams, but the fence is still up and it looks like the central rotor is the only part back on the pad. I did just notice that the path between Coney Bar-B-Que and the Scrambler does line up nicely with the Monster. There is, of course, the planter separating that path from the ride, but it's nice to notice something like this in a park I already know so well!

As opposed to making SC a separate admission, I feel like it might make more sense to just increase the prices of season passes. Which, unpopular opinion, I wouldn’t be opposed too if it meant improved experiences.

There was probably some truth to that during the "make it all new and DAZZLING" Paramount days when the goal was to actively get rid of the past so the park seemed hip and new (like removing Antiques and Flying Eagles to put a new ride in that spot that arguably wouldve been way better in a different part of the park) but with the new focus on being a well-rounded, family-friendly, multi-generational park, I think the train would be safe as just a round trip ride.

Any updates on monster recently?

If I recall correctly the name comes from Enchanted Forest Water Safari. The park names themselves may be something else (these trademarks feel like a way to get their foot in the door) and could each end up being a secondary name (aside from St. Louis). I would imagine any new names might follow the existing scheme and come out to Enchanted Michigan's Adventure and Enchanted Worlds of Fun (assuming they also purchase WoF). It is interesting that these trademark applications were filed for the IC 025 class for clothing and merchandise instead of the IC 041 class for Amusement Park Services like park names are. This could be to get a little bit of a head start on making merch. I think the IC 041 trademark application will come closer to when any actual sale is announced. There's been a little speculation online about this potentially being an owner-manager situation where Enchanted Parks simply takes over the management of these parks — especially since most of them are water parks — however I don't see that happening. I think it's possible that these parks could be spun off into their own company if they get flipped. There could be enough traction for them to operated independently. The operating budgets of larger prospective buyers would be about where they are now under Six Flags IMO. Most of the larger operators (Herschend, Merlin Entertainment, Six Flags, and United Parks) either just bought up a bunch of properties or are not doing too well financially. This is another reason why I feel like they could be spun off into their own company. This one is hard for me to find a good answer for. These parks are good enough as small to mid-size regional parks and any downsizing could work against them. I don't think it would be a good idea to make the water parks be owned independently from the dry parks in these particular situations, but it's clear that this area of guest experience is not particularly Six Flags' forte.

Yeah I figured that they’re not necessarily a high value item, but to me they seem like a great piece for any Hanna-Barbera collector. I mean even if it is just the gloves, it’s not too often you see costume pieces from any of the parks show up.

As far as a potential sale goes: Interesting, and not unexpected. If true (and if WoF and Great Escape are being sold with their respective water parks), I didn't expect Six Flags to pull out of Missouri entirely. Then again, none of the major Missouri parks except maybe Silver Dollar City have been meaningfully growing over the last 20 years, so I do kinda get it. One could extrapolate from the lower-cost investments at SFSL and WoF over the years that there isn't a strong ROI there, for any number of reasons. As far as that name goes: Oof. "Enchanted Parks" is the least compelling name I've ever heard, lol. United Parks used to take the cake, but it at least falls in that realm of Tacky Corporate Names where you could conceivably imagine, if incorrectly, "Yeah, okay, maybe the first owner decades ago wasn't super imaginative and they've just stuck with the name." "Enchanted Parks St. Louis" sounds like the first-draft name of a long-closed amusement park from a Scooby-Doo episode where the gang gets chased out by Old Man Peabody in a ghost costume. It should be noted, IAM seems to make their money by "flipping" parks that aren't doing great, then selling them. They seem to have largely owned small water parks and FECs. WoF, SFSL, MA, and Great Escape would likely be some of the largest properties they've ever owned. I'd be extremely curious to see what about them gets "flipped" if the plan is to resell them. One could assume that Herschend has already had their opportunity to make an offer on any properties they want, so the questions that immediately come to mind are: 1. Who would be the remaining prospective buyers once these parks are flipped? 2. What kind of operating budget would prospective buyers be able to commit to these parks? (I assume it would be less than what is currently needed, or else those buyers would presumably have already offered to purchase them directly from Six Flags.) 3. What additions/removals will be needed to make those parks and their operating budgets more appealing for prospective buyers? Not to beat a dead horse, but as someone who thinks that Michigan's Adventure overexpanded years ago and that's why it doesn't get significant additions, I will be extremely curious to see if some rides disappear there or have further measures taken to reduce operating costs. RMC is comparatively cheap and they've already started replacing track on Shivering Timbers, so I look for the rest of the ride to get I-Box track but keep the same profile. Presumably something similar will happen with Wolverine Wildcat. I wonder what the future holds for Corkscrew, Thunderhawk, or Mad Mouse. Camille Jourden-Mark, whose father bought MA in the 1960's and who had been VP and GM of MA from 1988 till 2024's Six Flags corporate restructuring, has been replaced by Carson Weingart, who had previously been director of food and beverage at Cedar Point. Camille has been quoted as saying that Dick Kinzel told her after the purchase to "run the park as her own," so one could assume that the corporate team has largely been hands-off with MA for a significant amount of time. That being said, the Jourden family is, as I understand it, no longer involved in major decisions at MA for the first time in decades, so I wonder what happens now that people with presumably less of an emotional attachment to the park are calling the shots, especially if those people are incentivized to make the park seem more appealing to a new buyer.

The properties listed in the trademarks are as follows: Enchanted Parks St. Louis (Six Flags St. Louis) Enchanted Parks Michigan Adventure (Michigan's Adventure) Enchanted Parks Water Safari (Enchanted Forest Water Safari) *Already owned by IAM Enchanted Parks Oceans of Fun (Oceans of Fun) Enchanted Parks Galveston (Schlitterbahn Waterpark Galveston) Enchanted Parks Water's Edge Inn (Water's Edge Inn) *Already owned by IAM Enchanted Parks Great Escape Lodge (Six Flags Great Escape Lodge) Enchanted Parks Camping Resort (Old Forge Camping Resort) *Already owned by IAM Interesting that it lists Oceans of Fun and the Great Escape Lodge without Worlds of Fun and Great Escape, so I imagine those trademarks haven't been finalized yet.

Some new trademark applications by Enchanted Parks. (see attached image) EDIT: Found a trademark for Enchanted Parks Great Escape Lodge. This appears to be a park sale to Innovative Attraction Management and they are rebranding these parks and the parks in Old Forge, NY that they purchased in 2024 to the Enchanted Parks brand.

this must be a satire question... Personally a restroom is a restroom.