Gordon Bombay

Thats a good point about the original WOTW however, due to technicalitys paramount probably cant market it well. One of the things that best markets the new rides like IJ and TRTR is who starred in the movies.......people like Angelina Jolie and CHarlize THeron.......they can market the newer motion picture better because it has speildberg and cruises name on it. Most people probably dont know that the movie is based on a book and an earlier movie. If paramount were to theme a ride after the 1950's movie and Universal a ride after the newer one, UNiversal could probably come up with some claim like they own the rights to name an attraction after that movie franchise and thus Paramount could not create a themed ride.

^Highly themed family coaster made by Premeir rides

I cant believe that! WHy are they removing it scoob? Isnt there a new Jaws movie coming out?

Actually, it would not be hard for them at all to do what I suggested, it would be very inexpensive as well.

I remember seing a video at employee orientation that featured Paul Hogan sitting in a chair with BB behind him as he spoke about it. Was he at teh grand opening or was it just the stunt double?

I agree with SKippy, it would be great to get a King Kong themed ride.....but I see Universal putting so much more into the idea if they have the rights as opposed to if Paramount Parks had them.

^Maybe SDATHC will receieve a new storyline with recordings of shaggy and such explaining the story behind the christmas caper........thus setting you up for a brand new experience. While yes, the cardboard theming is tacky, its probablyreally easy to tear it out and put in some other theming of the same material....so maybe this christmas caper thing will be like a whole new ride experience.

^Good stuff.

Look at the site wooferbear posted and see where "SCOTH" got their information, from two flawed EPA and WHO reports, if passive smoke was really this mass murderer thered be WAY more regulation and restriction on smoking, yet there arent enough facts to proove that its killing enough people. Yeah, if you stand everyday next to a smoker for 45 years for about 6 hours, it will make you sick, but the same thing would happen with a household product and gasoline. Second hand smoke isnt killing anyone. LINK!

First off your the one getting your info from the wrong sources, had you taken the time to read through the topic you wouldve seen the link wooferbear posted about how both the EPA and WHO reports on second hand smoke are not only seriously flawed, but horribly innacurate. Go read the site, it has everything it says backed up and guess what.......second hand smoke.......doesnt kill you.

^I agree with you man, I think its total crap when smokers dont obey the rules, especially those who smoke in line, its so much fun to bust them as an employee and I agree its an AWFUL smell and iritating to a lot of people. I, myself, dont smoke and think smoking is in now way good for you. Im just saying that all the hype about 2nd hand smoke being the 2nd holocaust is a load of crap. It smells bad, it agrivates allergies (I have them too), and its rude, but its not murdering people by the thousands everyday.

yes please get photos

This is a little more sophisticated than an announcer on a p.a. system, and a little more effective than a persons voice, very shrill. Why do you think they make the announcement? Because they can detect the storm before it comes duh, come on people. They dont just sit there and wait for obvious signs.

Ever thought maybe you have asthma or an allergie to the smoke? Plus it hasnt been proven to cause any fatal pain to you. My best friend cant stand to be around smoke cause of his allergies, but its in no way killing him. 2nd hand smoke is in no way a mass murder device killing us off one by one.

Im sure PKI has something like that, as most places liek them parks, golf courses, and other things of that nature do.

Yes it does I dont care what people and what sites say 2nd Hand Smoke does kill like the smurfy one said c'mon people its friggin common sense!The FACTUAL info is that second hand smoke does kill I dont care what else you have to say that info is what cigarette comps want you to take as the truth! I'm done with this topic. YOu are the biggest idiot, by far, you ignore the facts put together with good source by an independednt and neutral man and you ignored what Boddah said which made great sense. Second hand smoke wont kill you, your just too dumb and too proud to admit when your wrong. SCOOBY DOO HAS BEEN PWNED.....AGAIN! Get over yourself!

Didnt you read through the topic or any of the FACTUAL info provide? Smoking kills...second hand smoke however does not.

Rumor sounds stupid, probably wont happen.

^How much did you spend on the site wooferbear provided? All it does is list scientific facts and give the sources, plus publish the results of two poorly done surveys. It doesnt lean to one side, it just publishes the facts.

^I dont agree with smoking in anyway and its a dirty habbit. But go to this site and see that SECOND HAND SMOKE IS NOT THE THIRD LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH BEHIND ALCOHOL ABUSE AND REGULAR SMOKING. Your more likely to be killed inhaling pledge every day than second hand smoke. The TRUTH and STAND movements got their info from two poorly done EPA and WHO studies. Read this to get the truth. LINK! Lets see you talk now...

Boddah always comes in and sets things straight, well said Ryan.

There wouldnt be such a problem with smokers if most of them werent so rude and if most of them just threw their trash in the garbage.

^Great link WooferBear. 2nd Hand smoke presents a risk of lung cancer but as the site says, it is a very small and insignifigant risk with the EPA and WHO's numbers being inproportianate to the study. As for you Revengeoftheidiots, why dont you go read around that site. Its more deadly to be around inhaling Pledge everyday than cigarette smoke. Why do I need proof? To show you idiots that your wrong. Thanks Wooferbear for the fantasic link!

And what toxic vapors would those be? Lets see proof. Theres toxic vapors in everything, in the gas you pump, in the cleaning products you use. Those dont seem to be killing anyone indirectly. Once again, wheres the proof of your claims?

Not to just start a fight with you Scooby, cause Im against smoking as well and hate how rude smokers can be and how the ban is not enforced, as an employee I enforce it when I can, but where is your proof that second hand smoke kills? Ive been all up and down websites like Truth and havent seen any proof, just 2nd hand stories. I agree smoking is rude, but there has never been any factual proof that 2nd hand smoke has the ability to kill people on a large scale, or else it would be big news.