Jump to content

Decoding Episode II: Rivertown 2017 and the Falling Trees


jcgoble3

Recommended Posts

Forgot about most of it but the scarecrow and fence. But still, think this one is being teased more. Earlier than the 2013 tease. Then again I dont remember when the tease started for Banshee.

Sent from my N9130 using Tapatalk

What has KI done that's been teasing for this ride, again a few signs, maybe a few posts on Snapchat or Twitter? We are the one making mountains from mole hills.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sending an axe to a news station.

I honestly feel sorry for you. Your only enjoyment is to come on here and troll a fan site. I really hope you and the others like you get the help you sorely need. If you need professional references a few of us can reference mental health workers who may be able to identify the reason you find gratification from trolling fan sites. But hey at least you are not on drugs. Good luck and God bless, may you find the help you need.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot about most of it but the scarecrow and fence. But still, think this one is being teased more. Earlier than the 2013 tease. Then again I dont remember when the tease started for Banshee.

Sent from my N9130 using Tapatalk

What has KI done that's been teasing for this ride, again a few signs, maybe a few posts on Snapchat or Twitter? We are the one making mountains from mole hills.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sending an axe to a news station.

I honestly feel sorry for you. Your only enjoyment is to come on here and troll a fan site. I really hope you and the others like you get the help you sorely need. If you need professional references a few of us can reference mental health workers who may be able to identify the reason you find gratification from trolling fan sites. But hey at least you are not on drugs. Good luck and God bless, may you find the help you need.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So i am beginning to wonder if what was submitted is only to get approval for the foundation/footers in the "area of work" section, and the rest of the layout is just a generic representation? Why would the plans have the "area of work" highlighted, but none of the other areas?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, the comments on WCPO's Facebook page are REALLY outlandish. They're saying that the train op told them the ride is going to be named Son of Beast. Lol!!!!

Well, to be fair, more than one train spieler has been saying approximately that ("Over there is where they're rebuilding Son of Beast.") On one of my recent rides, a group of teenage girls behind me weren't really listening to the spiel but the mention of SoB perked their ears, and they started trying to get him to repeat what he said. I turned and told them what he had said but explained he was kidding. That there may be a new coaster but they aren't rebuilding SoB, and that either way, the spieler was making a joke.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm...

Barrels are made by Coopers.

The new ride is going to be near Diamondback.

The Arizona Diamondbacks play in Phoenix.

Alice Cooper owns a baseball-themed establishment in Phoenix.

...The new ride is going to be called "Kevin Bacon!"

But why would they name a new ride after one of the Petting Farm pigs (seriously, that's the bigger pig's name)? Hmmm...

 

Related to that, what if the ride is Sam the Butcher themed? I'm not seeing a lot of evidence for this, but I also haven't seen Gator or Sam on here very much lately...

 

-MDMC, just speculatin'...

 

In all seriousness, I'm really excited for when the announcement actually happens so we can all find out what will really be coming for 2017.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forgot about most of it but the scarecrow and fence. But still, think this one is being teased more. Earlier than the 2013 tease. Then again I dont remember when the tease started for Banshee.

Sent from my N9130 using Tapatalk

What has KI done that's been teasing for this ride, again a few signs, maybe a few posts on Snapchat or Twitter? We are the one making mountains from mole hills.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sending an axe to a news station.
I honestly feel sorry for you. Your only enjoyment is to come on here and troll a fan site. I really hope you and the others like you get the help you sorely need. If you need professional references a few of us can reference mental health workers who may be able to identify the reason you find gratification from trolling fan sites. But hey at least you are not on drugs. Good luck and God bless, may you find the help you need.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That was a long while ago lol and....am I the one being deemed a troll?

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoted from our ToS-

 

Posting information that is not public record and could be damaging to the reputation, business and/or day to day operation of Kings Island or its affiliates is a violation of the terms of service. Any information posted claiming to be from an inside source or claiming to be confirmed, when not being released from Kings Island or Cedar Fair, must be posted along with the name of the source. Failure to do so is a violation of an individual user's terms of service.

 

 

Care to remedy this GavPenn?

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, the comments on WCPO's Facebook page are REALLY outlandish. They're saying that the train op told them the ride is going to be named Son of Beast. Lol!!!!

Well, to be fair, more than one train spieler has been saying approximately that ("Over there is where they're rebuilding Son of Beast.") On one of my recent rides, a group of teenage girls behind me weren't really listening to the spiel but the mention of SoB perked their ears, and they started trying to get him to repeat what he said. I turned and told them what he had said but explained he was kidding. That there may be a new coaster but they aren't rebuilding SoB, and that either way, the spieler was making a joke.
I'm sure he was joking too, but these people were believing him/her.

Sent from my LG-D851 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quoted from our ToS-

 

Posting information that is not public record and could be damaging to the reputation, business and/or day to day operation of Kings Island or its affiliates is a violation of the terms of service. Any information posted claiming to be from an inside source or claiming to be confirmed, when not being released from Kings Island or Cedar Fair, must be posted along with the name of the source. Failure to do so is a violation of an individual user's terms of service.

 

 

Care to remedy this GavPenn?

 

I'm sorta playing Devi's Advocate here...

 

Your post makes it sound like you're interested in learning his source(s) and how he gained the knowledge/information he claims to have more than you are interested in adherence to TOS. If you were concerned strictly with TOS, why wouldn't you just report any posts where you felt TOS was violated and move one to let the admins/moderators handle it? Why call him out publicly?

 

I know some/many people here don't think GavPenn is credible (I have no opinion one way or the other), but the best way for people to establish credibility in a forum like this is to provide information that later turns out to be accurate. Doing so means he's either lucky or has reliable and credible sources. If he does so on multiple topics/projects in the future, his credibility goes up.

 

I'm glad I don't really have any connections because I would want to help share information, but I would not post the name of the source because getting a friend fired from their job over a web site's TOS is not what friends do.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't know how legit this is but looks pretty good if this is what is going in

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

 

Sorry to crush anyone's hope that this is legit. This is just a screenshot from a concept created by a fan. 

 

. The actual screen grab was taken towards the end of the video. 
  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I was wondering what the utimate source was for that 3D rendering of the layout. Relieved it is basically fan fiction, because I didn't much like the looks of it.

Btw, when I have had "insider" info (not on this specific subject, but occasionally I have learned things that weren't ready to be public) I wouldn't post about it or tell it to others. If I were an insider myself, and learned someone I knew was claiming to have insider info (either dangling it or outright sharing it), whether or not they outed me as the source, I would no longer discuss anything with them.

Basically, GavPenn: either you do have insider information and you are disrespecting both your source (by sharing that info) and the rules of this board (by not naming the source of your info) or you are lying. Either way, yes, you have proved yourself to not be trustworthy.

  • Like 19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Basically, GavPenn: either you do have insider information and you are disrespecting both your source (by sharing that info) and the rules of this board (by not naming the source of your info) or you are lying. Either way, yes, you have proved yourself to not be trustworthy.

 

Continuing as Devil's Advocate...

 

Unless his source is ok with him disclosing the information on the condition of anonymity. (which was a condition to my comment above about wanting to share the info, I just thought that would be understood)

 

Because you wouldn't share information with anybody does not mean others wouldn't. If everybody felt that way, no company would ever have things leak out.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I generally do leave the ToS enforcement up to the moderators. GavPenn specifically asked when he had been untrustworthy (or claimed not to have been, I forget, and he has since edited the post) and I was referencing his ToS violations in addition to his disrespect of his source. Your "devil's advocating" for him having some special relationship with his source, their not giving a crap or actually encouraging some random guy who has pretty much not ever posted about anything other than how much he knows but can't tell us about, doesn't account for that part.

So let me make it extremely clear so you don't feel the need to advocate on single parts while ignoring the whole. One of the following cases applies:

1. He is untrustworthy for sharing information that he doesn't have permission to share.

2. He is untrustworthy for sharing information that he has implied or explicit permission to share from the source, but is doing so in violation of this forum's explicit rules that require identifying sources, that he agreed to when he created his account and has been reminded of.

3. He is untrustworthy because he is out and out lying about having any special information, and is making the same educated guesses the rest of us are making, while the rest of us are honest where our information comes from (eyes at the park, plans from Mason, etc).

  • Like 18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...