Jump to content

The Son of Beast Discussion Thread


BoddaH1994
 Share

Recommended Posts

^Yes, SoB was a major attraction in the park, but how long a line is does not determine how popular a ride is.

Blocking, train capacity, dispatch times, single riders, time of day, ride placement, handicap riders, and uptime (and other contributing factors) will result in line length.

Yes, people will run to the biggest ride near the park entrance when the park opens. This happens at many parks (i.e. Raptor @ CP, Apollo's Chariot @ BGE etc.)

Think about why SoB is so mysterious. The loop removal, new trains, constant track modifications, constant issues, constant downtime, constant media attention. The ride has been a mystery since day one- you never know what you are gonna get.

And consider the amount of downtime SoB has had since 2000. There have been many people that have not had the opportunity to actually ride SoB as they are only able to get to KI once a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ yes i realize all this. this has all been discussed before. i was talking about the line and not popularity. But if we're gonna talk about that, SOB and The Beast have similar capacities + or - 100 people and they usually have similar length lines. If Beast is a better ride and a more popular attraction then why does this happen? I'm not saying SOB is the a hugely popular ride, but it seems like whenever someone talks about que lengths there is another person right there to remind us all that that doesn't mean anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ yes i realize all this. this has all been discussed before. i was talking about the line and not popularity. But if we're gonna talk about that, SOB and The Beast have similar capacities + or - 100 people and they usually have similar length lines. If Beast is a better ride and a more popular attraction then why does this happen? I'm not saying SOB is the a hugely popular ride, but it seems like whenever someone talks about que lengths there is another person right there to remind us all that that doesn't mean anything.

If you were not referring to popularity & line length, then I misunderstood. Can you explain what you mean by line length that does not refer to popularity?

I also find it difficult to compare Beast & SoB when it comes down to line length. Beast has been around since 1979 and has had excellent uptime vs. SoB which has been around since 2000 and has had (rough number) about 60% uptime during that time. The opportunities to ride Beast vastly outweigh SoB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By only a little. SOB was never a long line.

 

Um it wasn't? When I was always there it was like a half hour and the park wasn't crowded.

Thats highly unusual.

everyone was arguing about que length so i responded.

about The Beast and sob. lets take the period from mid 2007-mid 2009. both rides had good uptime during this period. both rides had similar capacity and lines.

my point is SOB is a decently popular ride. definitely not a Diamondback or a Firehawk, but..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

about The Beast and sob. lets take the period from mid 2007-mid 2009. both rides had good uptime during this period. both rides had similar capacity and lines.

When SoB re-opened without the loop and had new trains it was practically a new ride.

Comparing a ride that is, for all practical purposes, a new ride vs. a ride that has been around for over 25 years IMO is uncomparable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, if you are getting you're facts on Son of Beast (Or Beast's, for that matter) capacity from KI's site, you are highly mistaken.

http://www.visitkingsisland.com/attractions/detail.cfm?ai_id=162

This lists Flight of Fear's hourly capacity at 2,000 people per hour. I HIGHLY doubt that is so. Note further down the page they list the ride as having 4 trains. It NEVER ran 4 trains.

So the site exaggerates the capacity to it's greater advantage. The site says the capacity for SOB is 1,000 pph and Beast is 1,200 pph. Do you honestly think a ride with 2 trains of 24 people per train is that close to a ride with 3 trains of 36 people per train?

Moral of the story: Don't trust the KI website for anything more then the ticket prices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like your last line. Like we found out in Haunt, you can't even trust the calendar. :P And as far as capacity, Diamondback has come close to 1620 pph...once. :lol: There is no chance SOB is close to Beast as far as capacity. See the above post for reasons why. I just felt like adding that because its ridiculous to believe so.

And now to add my thoughts...While the line length can't really attest to how popular a ride is, word of mouth can. At least 3 times a day, people would ask me at Diamondback what was wrong with SOB. While 3 people isn't a lot, those are only the people who cared enough to ask. I also believe that the fact that people were willing to wait a half hour on a slow day is a show of it's popularity. You aren't going to wait for a ride you dislike. Most people know how long the line is as they enter the line due to signage or asking the ride op. For example: If the wait for Firehawk is more than 15 minutes I won't get in line, but all the people already in line feel that the ride is good enough for at least a 15 minute wait. Does that make sense at all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, if you are getting you're facts on Son of Beast (Or Beast's, for that matter) capacity from KI's site, you are highly mistaken.

http://www.visitkingsisland.com/attractions/detail.cfm?ai_id=162

This lists Flight of Fear's hourly capacity at 2,000 people per hour. I HIGHLY doubt that is so. Note further down the page they list the ride as having 4 trains. It NEVER ran 4 trains.

So the site exaggerates the capacity to it's greater advantage. The site says the capacity for SOB is 1,000 pph and Beast is 1,200 pph. Do you honestly think a ride with 2 trains of 24 people per train is that close to a ride with 3 trains of 36 people per train?

Moral of the story: Don't trust the KI website for anything more then the ticket prices.

It can happen but it's highly unlikely. On Kings Islands website the hourly capcity for Diamondback is 1,620 but it only reached it once. So the hourly capacity Kings Island lists can be true but will it happen? Probably not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCDB lists SOB as having a 2:20 ride time. Take into account about 20 seconds on the brake run and 40 seconds in the station (optimistically) then it's 3:20 per cycle. There's 24 riders per cycle times 2 trains that's 48 riders every 2 cycles. With the number of cycles possible in one hour that brings the capacity to a mathematically optimistic 840 or so riders per hour. 1000 is quite an estimate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCDB lists SOB as having a 2:20 ride time. Take into account about 20 seconds on the brake run and 40 seconds in the station (optimistically) then it's 3:20 per cycle. There's 24 riders per cycle times 2 trains that's 48 riders every 2 cycles. With the number of cycles possible in one hour that brings the capacity to a mathematically optimistic 840 or so riders per hour. 1000 is quite an estimate.

They are probably using the older trains for hourly capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And by the way, if you are getting you're facts on Son of Beast (Or Beast's, for that matter) capacity from KI's site, you are highly mistaken.

http://www.visitkingsisland.com/attractions/detail.cfm?ai_id=162

This lists Flight of Fear's hourly capacity at 2,000 people per hour. I HIGHLY doubt that is so. Note further down the page they list the ride as having 4 trains. It NEVER ran 4 trains.

So the site exaggerates the capacity to it's greater advantage. The site says the capacity for SOB is 1,000 pph and Beast is 1,200 pph. Do you honestly think a ride with 2 trains of 24 people per train is that close to a ride with 3 trains of 36 people per train?

Moral of the story: Don't trust the KI website for anything more then the ticket prices.

i wasn't going off that. the website is quite inaccurate. i bet the two rides get like 700 people an hour with beast being on the higher end with 3 trains. but beast sometimes has to wait for a train to go over the lift and it has old fashioned manual releases that can take a while for the operators to use. which is why it isn't as high as it could be. modify the block system and slap some timberliners on it and beast would be a relatively quick line.

beast manual release(box on side):

beasttrain.jpg

newer style release on new ptc's and g-trains (yellow pedal):

p15972.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wasn't going off that. the website is quite inaccurate. i bet the two rides get like 700 people an hour with beast being on the higher end with 3 trains. but beast sometimes has to wait for a train to go over the lift and it has old fashioned manual releases that can take a while for the operators to use. which is why it isn't as high as it could be. modify the block system and slap some timberliners on it and beast would be a relatively quick line.

Timberliners on Beast?! I honestly have never thought of that. But I bet a lot of people would argue that it takes away from its older feel. But that is a really interesting thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the current financial condition of the park's owner, and the likely motives of any new buyer in the immediate future, I'd not be thinking that Timberliners on Beast is a reasonable prospect for the forseeable future...

But if it were to save quite a bit on, say, track maintenance costs, it could save them money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...