Jump to content

Decoding 2020


fryoj

Recommended Posts

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:17 PM, Vortex39 said:

So... basically you're determining this by saying that the footing is 3 feet wide... and it's to exact scale with everything else in the diagram... and a little over 111 of those footings would fit withing the length of that lift hill? Thus around 335 feet?

 

How did a program determine this? Is it measuring pixels from the .jpg? Or basically like a ruler overlay? 

 

Are things like representations of footings drawn to *exact scale* in diagrams like these? I had always assumed not. I would assume the actual distance scale they put on there would be accurate. Can you explain how you arrived at this in a little more detail?

Expand  

This guy or gal used Bluebeam, and yes it has a measuring tool based off an initial calibration.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:36 PM, Vortex39 said:

So you are saying the footer you used on the diagram is drawn to exact scale in relation to everything else in the diagram and you extrapolated your math from there, right? Thanks.

Expand  

Correct. I've double checked it with the detail that dimensions the footing at the base of the lift as well. Section 1/S3.3.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:52 PM, Bwb.32 said:

okay so uh? you have the lift hill going the wrong direction? soooooo? the real blueprints we can prove are real show the lift going project north. not the direction youve drawn it. 

 

Expand  

Except, as was proven on the Mystic Timbers Plans, Plan North, And True North are not the same.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:52 PM, bengalsguy23 said:

I think all the people who have the screenshot and aren't sending it just like the attention. Sad really. Wouldn't't be surprised if some of the people claiming they have seen it really haven't.

Expand  

That’d be like RuthlessAirtime and I went and got the documents, told everyone we had them, and then said we weren’t sharing them.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:39 PM, DeltaFlyer said:

Correct. I've double checked it with the detail that dimensions the footing at the base of the lift as well. Section 1/S3.3.

Expand  

But as Kissfan4 said a couple of pages back, and what I have always thought as well, "They will use the coordinate sheet for the locations, then use the detail drawings provided for the specific dimensions and tolerances the footers have to meet." i.e. they show the footers location but they're not drawn to scale, i.e. you can't scale things off the representation of footers on the diagram. They're not to scale. The only thing we have to go on to give scale is the actual length scale they gave us, that's its purpose, which indicates the lift hill is around 200 feet long.

 

You're saying the length scale is wrong because of your estimation based on the footers as represented on the diagram. It seems to me that the actual length scale given is more likely to be accurate than to scale things off a 15 pixel wide representation of a footer, which from what I can gather, is not intended to be scale accurate. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah because I’ve gotten a ton of positive attention from this. Is it that hard to believe that I actually care about people’s hard work and don’t want to leak the entirety of the project that was not supposed to be leaked? I thought the second I saw the layout I’d be filled with joy and happiness with knowing what’s coming to the park but instead I’m filled with anxiety. This whole summer we could all have looked forward to all the tiny clues and rumors and have fun debunking them but instead you guys want to know almost everything there is to know. I get it you are all curious but think about the park for once. If you were Don or Chad would you really want everything leaked like that by someone who Broke their NDA? Sorry for thinking about the park instead of myself. 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 5/8/2019 at 11:57 PM, Ben43065 said:

Yeah because I’ve gotten a ton of positive attention from this. Is it that hard to believe that I actually care about people’s hard work and don’t want to leak the entirety of the project that was not supposed to be leaked? I thought the second I saw the layout I’d be filled with joy and happiness with knowing what’s coming to the park but instead I’m filled with anxiety. This whole summer we could all have looked forward to all the tiny clues and rumors and have fun debunking them but instead you guys want to know almost everything there is to know. I get it you are all curious but think about the park for once. If you were Don or Chad would you really want everything leaked like that by someone who Broke their NDA? Sorry for thinking about the park instead of myself. 

Expand  

Can you at least tell us if it looks good or not? I just want to know a little about what is coming.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • malem locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...