disco2000

All I have heard is they are looking into saving Moonlight Gardens, but I don't think they have committed to it. Irrelevant question now, but would the Coney lovers preferred they save the pool or the gardens? Is saving the gardens, if they decide to do it, enough goodwill or was it the pool everyone wanted? Let me give you a counter to think about regarding you mentioning considering not being a CSO supporter in the future. But let me start with since some here seem to think I am a Coney hater, that is unequivocally false. My family is a multi-generational lover, supporter, and attendee of all things Coney Island. I bet my family had passes to Coney longer than many of the Coney supporters protesting what is happening. Let's just say I might not be here if it were not for Coney Island LOL.... But I am also a realist and know that my love and nostalgia for the place doesn't pay their bills and if a private business owner decides to sell the business, that is their choice. And if the purchaser wants to do something else with the land, that is their choice. Again, my memories of the place doesn't pay their bills. Let me also put on the record that I am not a CSO supporter LOL. At least not in a financial sense. It is great that they provide a world-class orchestra and musical experience for those into that scene, but I have never attended a CSO event or concert and never went to Riverbend and never made a financial contribution. Not my scene. I won't be going to any concerts there in the future either. Again, not my scene. I would rather it have remained Coney. I think we have too many concert venues as it is, many of which are supported with my hard earned tax dollars. But apparently there were not enough people going to Coney and spending money to make it a viable business. But we also have to remember that Coney Island as a "historical significance" disappeared when the rides were moved to KI or demolished. They even wrote a book about it and had a farewell season. Further, it was Taft that ultimately killed Coney Island as a slow death. Taft bought Coney Island in 1969 and a mere FOUR months later in July 1969 announced they were going to close Coney and build a new park and move rides to what became Kings Island. Rides were either demolished or moved to Kings Island. Taft put the land up for sale. Taft could not find a buyer and reluctantly opened the pool and operated it for 4 years without making a profit and couldn't find a buyer and wasn't sold until 1987 and then sold again to the Walker family in 1991. So the Walker family operated Coney for 32 years before selling. Taft owned it a mere 4 months and decided to close it and moved all the rides to KI and then couldn't find a seller so then operated the pool for 15 years before selling it. I am grateful we got 50 more years out of the place and everyone under the age of 50 got to experience a glimpse of its former shell. I mentioned back in 2020 in this thread that I felt Coney got rid of the rides to speed up the process of making the land worth more as something else than a pool and would probably get turned into a concert venue or an addition to the casino. @BoddaH1994at the time said I gave Walker too much credit LOL. Maybe so, but the writing was on the wall then that Coney as we knew it days were numbered. And yes Coney did donate land that became Riverbend - it was a smart business move. It was land not being used and then their parking lot became a significant source of revenue. Some have claimed Walker made more in Riverbend parking than he did operating the pool. Had they not done that, Coney may have closed even sooner. From what I hear, MEMI wasn't the only interested buyer. I was told an out of state developer that builds those new apartments/condo things that we see popping up all over apparently was looking at taking advantage of the casino close by to build one of those types of communities like what took over Blue Ash airport. Floodplain and all because they would have simply elevated the platforms like the school that was built in a floodplain near Lunken Airport, they were looking at how to build there but their bid was rejected. And as I said when this sale was first announced, I thought they were stupid to wham/bam hit people with "hey Coney is closed and Riverbend on steriods is taking its place" and had they simply said they were closing and it is up for sale for some period of time that everyone knew about and then MEMI bought it, maybe the backlash wouldn't have been as bad? I can understand from a business perspective why they kept it on the down-low, but they should have expected some of this backlash. So then the question is, if it was a given Coney would no longer exist, would people prefer X number of an apartment complex or a concert venue that we are now getting?

^And yet it isn't the same when it comes to passholder preview at CP. Interesting that you caveat your statement with "Nothing has changed at all relative to what the purchase agreement was back in September, October, November, December, January, February, and almost all of March. Nothing." So by stating "and almost all of March" you are admitting they changed the purchase agreement? If not then why use the phrase "and almost all of March".... We get it you are their attorney and yes they never stated that passholder preview is a "benefit" of said purchase, but historically they offered a passholder preview without limitation/restriction as to which passholder could attend. And now they have. And yes we know about subject to change and past history is no indication of future performance, blah blah blah, but when a platinum passholder for the last 10 years has been able to go to CPs passholder preview and now they cannot after being sold that a gold pass + all park passport is the equivalent to a platinum passholder, I think you are smart enough to realize regardless of the legalize associated with it, that this passholder now feels like they were sold an offering that indeed isn't the same as a platinum pass. And ironically, the Schlittenbahn parks offer a Platinum pass while the CF "legacy" parks do not, and if you read the screenshot @BoddaH1994 posted, 2024 Platinum passes are accepted at CP passholder preview day, so folks from Schlittenbahn can attend but not folks with a gold + all park passport from any other park than CP... Certainly this was intentional as CF felt that those from a Schlittenbahn park are less likely to travel to CP for passholder preview than X number from KI... So this alone shows a Platinum pass is "worth" more or provides additional benefit that the "gold plus all park passport" does not. And I know you will blah blah blah that they are the same and blah blah blah, but the optics and perception is that there is indeed a difference between the platinum and gold plus all park passport... And now the chain has potentially set a precedent. Why would someone from a Dorney or Michigan's Adventure as an example want to renew a gold pass plus all park passport from their park? Renew at whatever park is getting the new attraction in the off event you are able to travel to a passholder preview? Granted it may not be a lot of people overall. But had this information been shared last August, CP could have potentially seen 30,000 or more people opt to renew their pass from CP instead of their "home park" and that could hurt the smaller parks in the chain. Or maybe that is the plan to be able to justify selling off the smaller parks as part of the merger..... And it are these types of business practices that will cause some to pause and wait until the following season to renew when they know what the offering is being provided, and that cuts into the valuable pre-season sales that the chain apparently relies on in August thru January or so...

Making us wait until Friday lol

I have said it before, but you sure do sound like you are part of the CF legal team You miss the ENTIRE point is EVERYWHERE CF has said a "gold pass + all park passport" is equivalent to what a prior platinum pass was. Now they have caveated these events that previously included platinum pass holders to exclude what the chain is selling as "equivalent" to a platinum pass. Had they kept the platinum pass concept, this wouldn't even be a discussion point right now. OR had they made this clear at marketing and change of the pass process that any park specific events are exclusive to the gold passholders of said park, then OK. I suspect they didn't say that because then many would have purchased the pass with CP in anticipation of the TT2 previews. I figured this is what they would do with the change. And yet here we are today with them still selling the gold pass with all park passport as being equivalent to a platinum, which they are showing is not the case. Personally I don't care because I wouldn't go to pass preview for just TT2 and select rides as we know how long those lines would be LOL. And maybe they should change the wording that you only receive the "special" benefits of your home gold pass for things like preview days as it would maybe manage the crowds just a bit. But the fact of the matter is they changed the direction 7 months after they started selling the passes touted as "same as platinum".... So when you gonna direct them to change the FAQ to reflect this? caveat emptor

I get it. As I have said before, at the end of the day, problems and all with the current direction the chain is going in, a season pass and add-ons still represents a tremendous value for the entertainment dollar and hard to beat on any other entertainment venue. Go to almost any restaurant outside of KI and try to spend less in a week on 2 meals per day than the meal plan for the whole season costs! Sadly, that also means they are given a lot of leeway before someone that says they are not going to renew actually doesn't renew.

Don't forget condiment upcharging.

Get paid a lot....

Not a knock on you, but it is this mindset that CF banks on. How many people have posted to social media or logged complaints with the park stating they will not be renewing due to the degraded experience or what not and then once the season rolls around, they end up renewing... That is why they can continue to devalue or "bait & switch" the offering because more people than not will renew regardless and they make up those that stay true to their word and not renew with those buying passes for the first time...

We will be left in the dark

But Cedar Point is so unfair and mean holding this on a day many have school and work (sarcasm for those thinking I am serious lol)

I am sure someone knows (calling my inner Terpy)

All of the events are now sold out.

Maybe KI was just ahead of this trend https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/sexy-water-is-all-the-rage-is-it-good-for-you-210304648.html

Yeah but they don't have cooler water infused with lemon and lime, subject to availability

Based on past history of how they treat Prestige holders, this seems to be about right But as we get closer they will cut off the Prestige holders two hours before the end of the event LOL.

If this were KI, the guests would have that figured out in no time as they climbed all over them at mommy's direction to get a cute photo...

caveat emptor

Sweet! Many of us will get a Racer ride with you! Even if just the same train LOL

Park is cashless and that includes change... But yeah charging would either cut down on the soda theft or increase it.

Six doesn't have that IP, but one can always hope....

Sounds like a good upcharge opportunity, right @Tr0y

Looks like more of the same LOL

Sometimes people take jokes too literally... @DJSkyFoxx posts a funny blurb in the same "tone" or style as typical KI blurbs of new events and people dissect it to pieces LOL

The fights that make the news are of the underage variety and thus the creation of the chaperone policy...

Plus, last year was 12-7 compared to 4-9pm this year. I don't know if I would call 2 more hours all day LOL. In fact 4-9pm may be busier than 12-7pm because those getting off work at 5pm probably didn't make the trip last year but would for a 9pm close this year.