Browntggrr

That is pretty funny.

Flaming and speaking the truth are two different things. Combining the comments and the website, it is clear he is a troll.

I have a sneaky hunch that given his rideaccidents.com banner, we are not the first to believe this individual to be a troll. Then he just adds gas to fire with his"family friend" comment, but doesn't have his facts straight to the point where they have to be edited. Given that, and many other examples that can be seen through his profile, I am happy to have an inaccurate coaster comment.

Classic movie! And so fitting here....

What is there to be confused about, and, where did you get the idea that there was some sort of surprise? The NFL tried it once in the bay area, it was not a boasting success, and haven't been back there since. Now other venues like Superdome in New Orleans, both the old & new stadiums in Tampa, and both the old & "new' stadiums in Miami have had multiple Super Bowls. Here is an intresting article on SB XIX: http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19850112&id=FEUwAAAAIBAJ&sjid=pKUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5531,447317

Exactly. The NFL is more apt to go back to a previous venue, unless things do not go as planned, or, it is too difficult (i.e. Minnesota, Jacksonville etc.)

Private event.... private event.... PRIVATE EVENT!?! Ok, bad pun, but that is funny!

There are different degrees of greying out. I305 sounds like it has it's own catagory. I have, on a few of numerous occaisions, slightly greyed out on MF. My wife has come to the conclusion that if I talk less in line, there will be more o2 in my blood, and I have a less chance of greying out. I am anxious to try I305 this summer to see how it effects me.

Here he goes again! I wonder how long it will be till someone ignores this....

Ah, another curveball. Intresting....

Dueling economic portraits of 49ers stadium deal http://www.mercuryne...?nclick_check=1 Depending on the accuracy of this quote, it will hit home for many of you: I really question this: The NFL has strict rules on the host stadium & city when it comes down to awarding Super Bowl sites. Capacity, hotel availability & weather all play large factors in that determination. The new stadium does seem just large enough, I am going to *assume* there are enough hotel rooms located within (I believe) 50 miles of the event site, but the weather could be the tipping point. Santa Clara, CA has an average hi/ low temperature in February of 62/ 45 (and don't forget the SB is in early February), and February is the 2nd worst month of precipitation (January is 1st). Those averages are not exactly a draw for most people. The NFL is contemplating having the SB at the new Meadowlands in NJ. The biggest drawback- the weather. The capacity is over 80,000, and New York city obviously has enough hotel rooms, NY is home to the NFL HQ, but the weather is the kicker. The article, curiously, does not bring up the lease agreement between SC & CF. I suggest reading the comments left by readers at the bottom link of the article. Quite intresting!

Not only was it "the first stand-up coaster to do a loop", it was the first stand up coaster period. Huh? Anyway, yeah nice photos. Technically a fact is a statement that can be proved or disproved. Not trying to be a smart aleck, just sayin. I personally think a few people here are a bit sensitive. Sure unaccurate posts are annoying but cut him some slack he just contributed to the site very much. Let's give this a 4th try. The first North American stand-up looping coaster was KC. The first stand-up looping coaster is Momonga Standing and Loop Coaster is Japan. It opened in 1979 as a sit down coaster and in 1982 added a stand-up train. The ride still operates today. Now I think where the wires are getting crossed is that the Japan coaster was not an original stand-up coaster whereas KC was. Some people may not credit the Japan coaster for this reason; which IMO is wrong. http://rcdb.com/r.htm?ot=2&nm=na&cs=277&ty=1&de=7&page=1&order=10 http://www.ultimaterollercoaster.com/coasters/yellowpages/coasters/standing-loop-coaster_yomiuriland.shtml

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/great-wolf-lodge-slides-into-the-world-record-book-during-24-hour-waterslide-athon-event-2010-04-08?reflink=MW_news_stmp Anyone here participate?

The day known as "Black Sunday" at KI was a series of unfortunate events. http://www.KICentral.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=817 Please see Dane's explanation as to what happened. It has the the most accurate information. There have been numerous "facts" listed in this thread, but most of them are rather "tainted". Nice pictures though!

I have to disagree. Sure, I am completely and totally of the persuasion that Cedar Fair might've said to Intamin, "You know this doesn't have to be as good as Millennium, you know?" (a plan that, if true, seems to have backfired). But I don't think Cedar Fair spend money (perhaps more importantly, time) by adding a trim break to the first hill. If they would close the ride and bring in Intamin and have a new break installed there, I doubt "letting Millennium Force win" would even be in the top ten reasons why. CF is not going to pull a Paramount (i.e. SoB shorter than Beast) and add a trim break because it is faster than MF. Where do people come up with this conspiracy theory stuff? The powers that be at CF can do the math and realize that MF is going into it's 11th season, it can't be a record breaker or be the fastest forever, even in their own park family. Not to mention, CF built a certain 420' coaster shortly after the debut of MF that goes considerably faster. What motivation would they have to slow down I305 vs. MF? It makes no sense. Now they will add a trim if the "greying out" becomes an issue with park guests. Check out this video, courtesy of Rob at TPR: If Rob, who has probably been on more coasters then the average bear, is "greying out", than I would have to assume that it will be a more intense effect on the average park guest. Enthusiasts love it. The others? Well I can see it scaring the he!! out of them. Coasters are built for the majority, not the minority. And face it, enthusiasts are the minority. I also do not believe that CF would incur any cost to add the trim. CF has a contract with Intamin for certain specs. If the "greying out" threshold is too intense, it would be up to Intamin to foot the bill, much like Intamin had to foot the bill for the design & track change to Maverick. havnt we been through this before? the ride has not received more trims. unless you count from the day it was built till the day it was open.... *You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink.* It was explained with: words, video, pop-up pictures, and crayon that Beast has not had trims added. http://www.KICentral...pic=20970&st=45

The weatherman has a difficult time predicting tomorrow's weather let alone weather 10 days from now. I wouldn't lose any sleep over a 10 day outlook forecast. It will probably change 5 more times before the 17th.

I thought ketchup was a vegtable?

Great pics! Hersheypark is one of my favorite parks. For anyone that wants to get an idea of what KI was like before Paramount, take a trip to Hershey. You will not be disappointed.

My wife bought another brand of ketchup other than Heinz- once. I made her promise me that she would never do that again. There are just a few things that you have to get a name brand for: Heinz Ketchup Hellman's Mayo Any name brand toilet paper Campbell's tomato soup Smucker's jelly Red Gold must have given CF a sweet deal to make the change. I doubt it will effect food sales though. When someone wants a hot dog or fries, I have never heard the order start out with "What kind of ketchup do you have?"

If you don't stop, you will grow hair on your hands and go blind!

I really question the validity of this CF quote made by the pro- stadium group: Especially given this quote, by CF, on October 10th, 2009: Now CF did say they would entertain a buy-out option, which is a part of the negotiation, but listening does not mean they want out. It simply means that CF has given the 49ers & Santa Clara something to consider as opposed to having no negotiations at all. Many negotiations have both sides asking for their "cake and eat it too" and end up meeting somewhere in the middle. I have a difficult time believing that losing the revenue GA generates for Santa Clara is worth the money going to be spent on the new stadium, and renovations to the area the stadium is going to require. I also cannot understand why the 49ers would want to move almost 40 miles away from where they are currently located, unless Santa Clara has given them a sweetheart deal on the land lease. If that is true, and GA is forced out, that would mean less money generated with the new stadium vs. the + $5 million GA pays Santa Clara.

Planet Snoopy, cast of thousands, ready to roll at California's Great America Read more: Planet Snoopy, cast of thousands, ready to roll at California's Great America - Silicon Valley / San Jose Business Journal: Splitting the uprights & scoring? Intresting wording....

That is the basic issue. The vote in June is to see if the people of Santa Clara want the stadium or not. The language used for the vote is being questioned. I have, numerous times, had to re-read a summary of a vote to comprehend what I am voting for. The language is written by lawyers, so it has the possibility of being quite misleading. If the citizens vote "yes", that would mean, at least, $79 million of taxpayer money will go to the stadium construction & improvements necessary to support the stadium. In addition, another $35 million will be generated by a tax on local hotels. So not only will thier taxes being going up, if they are going to have a family event, their guests to the area will be paying more to stay in the area. And then, if the people of Santa Clara want to go to a game, they will be paying an upwards of $100 just for a ticket for the game and also paying very high prices for refreshments/ food etc. in the stadium. And if you think prices are high for food & drink at KI, try an NFL game. From CF's point of view, they are being sqeezed out by the big kid on the block- the NFL.

Santa Clara leases the land to CF. What Santa Clara wants to do is break the contract and use the land that they lease to CF and use part of it for a new stadium. Think of it this way: you sign a lease to rent a business for 10 years that includes a parking lot for customers. 5 years into the lease, the landlord decides to use that parking lot for another business and construct a building on it. Instead of giving you something in return, like another option for your customers to park, they are going to break the lease by going to court. What is going to happen to your customers, that you have a good business with, if they have no options of parking their car? And the stadium is going to be used for more than just football on Sundays. Events take place (a majority of the time) on weekends- the same time GA is it's busiest. Now there has been talk that the Raiders may use the same stadium. That would double the football events.

Holiday World to unveil new $5.5 million "Wildebeest" water coaster in May http://www.fox59.com/news/sns-bc-in--holidayworld-ride,0,2858433.story