TombRaiderFTW Posted April 10 Share Posted April 10 1 hour ago, SonofBaconator said: So do you think Sally took advantage of the recent film? Sure, as much as smart business decisions can be thought of as "taking advantage of" something. See also: cartoon/comic book Wonder Woman getting several new Six Flags rides around the same time as the DCEU films, cartoon/comic book Spider-Man getting a few new Universal rides just before the Tobey Maguire era, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BiscyJS Posted April 11 Share Posted April 11 I really do hope they bring back Phantom Theater in some way but at the same time I don’t really trust Cedar Fair to pull off a dark ride. They don’t have the cleanest dark ride record under their belt. You have their rethemings to Boo Blasters (not really all that great), Wonder Mountain’s Guardian (which is okay), Voyage to the Iron Reef (which no one really cared about), and Knott’s Bear-y Tales (which seems pretty good). It does help that their most recent go at it went over alright, but they still have little experience with it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonofBaconator Posted May 29 Share Posted May 29 On 4/9/2023 at 6:48 PM, Captain Nemo said: Not technically a ride, but I'd like to mention what was removed in order for Diamondback to be built. IMO Diamondback removed more then it gave with that being the entire vibe of Rivertown. DBs construction is responsible for the removal of the TRTR plaza, old Beast plaza, the lake, Rivertown Mining buildings, and pretty much obliterated the aesthetics of Rivertown. I enjoy Diamondback, but I would gladly take back old Rivertown. Something I’d like to get people’s opinion on: Diamondback’s grass never seems to get too long as it’s regularly cut. Would it look “junky” if they let the grass grow and let nature reclaim part of the park? Normally I’d think overgrown grass would look bad but considering Rivertown is in the backwoods area of the park, would it look more natural? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeeastFarmer Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 9 hours ago, SonofBaconator said: Something I’d like to get people’s opinion on: Diamondback’s grass never seems to get too long as it’s regularly cut. Would it look “junky” if they let the grass grow and let nature reclaim part of the park? Normally I’d think overgrown grass would look bad but considering Rivertown is in the backwoods area of the park, would it look more natural? I think it would look unkempt. I understand they want splashdown views but I wish they would selectively plant trees and bushes. Also... Fix the hardscape. We have blacktop, concrete, and papers. Pick one and make the area consistent. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beastfan11 Posted May 30 Share Posted May 30 On 4/11/2023 at 1:44 AM, BiscyJS said: I really do hope they bring back Phantom Theater in some way but at the same time I don’t really trust Cedar Fair to pull off a dark ride. They don’t have the cleanest dark ride record under their belt. You have their rethemings to Boo Blasters (not really all that great), Wonder Mountain’s Guardian (which is okay), Voyage to the Iron Reef (which no one really cared about), and Knott’s Bear-y Tales (which seems pretty good). It does help that their most recent go at it went over alright, but they still have little experience with it. Definitely feel like with the recent thematic upgrades with Adventure Port, they have the chops to pull off PT/dark rides. Now, whether or not they would is a different story. But I have the utmost faith that they can. Ten years ago? Not so much. But I’ve been impressed with Mystic, Orion, and now AE + all of Adventure Port. Here’s to hoping! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PKIDelirium Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 To answer the thread title's question, I'm going to say the original Antique Cars. Paramount was bad at putting things where they didn't fit, like building IJST using less than half of that land instead of Action Zone where it would actually fit the theme of the area. Action Zone itself was meant to be a backlot, but instead they bulldozed a large area, an attraction the park itself was designed around, and just thunked it down there while leaving the rest of the property a bunch of flat grass. Regarding Diamondback, I'm sure it would be done differently now in a more area-fitting way, but the early Cedar Fair years focused more on catching up on things Paramount had lagged on, especially the spree of building B&M hypers. Maybe if Paramount hadn't done IJST how they did, Diamondback's station area could have taken the place of the closed Rivertown Antique Cars area and crossed the pathway using the lift hill instead of the drop, without removing the lake. The return run could have been a tunnel under the midway to get back to that side of the path for the finale element and brakes. Obviously there's no way to bring back Swan Lake as it was, but there's a lot of open grass on both sides of the pathway there, behind Showplace and also across from Diamondback that's sat vacant for a very long time now. A new lake as an entry to Rivertown could use both of those areas, with the pathway bridging over it. Diamondback's repaint is a welcome step in making it blend in more, but things like landscaping around the pool, upgrading and theming the queue, replanting the excessive number of removed trees behind the former Crypt building to better obscure the back half of the ride, there's plenty of things that can be done just with theme and landscape work to fit the area better. (There is still a box of broken flip phones that forms the "theming" for the queue. That got old ten years ago, guys.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlandTaxis30 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 3 hours ago, PKIDelirium said: To answer the thread title's question, I'm going to say the original Antique Cars. Paramount was bad at putting things where they didn't fit, like building IJST using less than half of that land instead of Action Zone where it would actually fit the theme of the area. Action Zone itself was meant to be a backlot, but instead they bulldozed a large area, an attraction the park itself was designed around, and just thunked it down there while leaving the rest of the property a bunch of flat grass. You and I both agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rlentless Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 I definitely agree with the Swan Lake removal . . although I love Diamondback. So I thought the return of Swan Lake in The Vortex spot would be nice. Theming with a flat or two, restaurant, shops like they have done with Adventure Port. Not sure of the theming but something to match Rivertown. Then concentrate the next new coaster to be in front with the replacement of Invertigo, Congo Falls, etc if they are close to retirement. Trust me I'd love to have a new coaster in The Vortex spot. But I think some year soon that Invertigo will not pass inspection and be SBNO. I don't think they can build two coasters in both The Vortex and Invertigo spots quickly. Then we'll be looking at another empty area for a few years again. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.