I've seen a few arguments about the "whys" and "why nots" regarding ArieForce One coming to Kings Island. Capacity being an issue, for one, Kings Island being a well balanced and mature park already and other parks in the chain needing a standout attraction. The biggest argument would be that Kings Island needs a standout attraction themselves having lost Vortex in 2019 without a replacement. That argument may seem selfish because I'm sure a lot of people want us to get an RMC. But what if we looked at it from a business perspective. Kings Island is Six Flags' "most penetrated park (their words, not mine)," getting people from not just Greater Cincinnati but Columbus, Dayton, Indianapolis, Louisville and Lexington (the same was true with Coney Island before 1971). Kings Island is a huge money maker for the chain and corporate is dependent on it bringing in money. With that said, the company is still struggling financially. ArieForce One is a beloved and renowned roller coaster by enthusiasts and a lot of the GP alike. The news about it being picked up by Six Flags is already getting people buzzing. Placing it at a park that isn't doing well, which may need a standout attraction in their lineup, in order to boost their attendance is a risky move when the company can't afford to take risks at this time; it may not be enough. Kings Island has already shown that they can generate money for Six Flags and legacy Cedar Fair; while parks cater to families and not roller coaster enthusiasts, a tried and true legendary coaster being placed at a tried and true park like Kings Island might make sense to bring in people who may have otherwise skipped Kings Island in order to go to Cedar Point which, despite doing well, constantly requires investment (plus they already have an RMC I-Box in Steel Vengeance, so it would be redundant at Cedar Point anyway). Just my two cents.